Sophie E. Parke
Psychometric equivalence of electronic and telephone completion of the ICIQ modules
Parke, Sophie E.; Uren, Alan D.; Uren, Alan; Cotterill, Nikki; Parke, Sophie E; Abrams, Paul
Authors
Alan D. Uren
Alan Uren
N Nikki Cotterill Nikki.Cotterill@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Long Term Conditions (Continence Care)
Sophie E Parke
Paul Abrams
Abstract
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Aims: To assess the equivalence of touch-screen (hand-held iPad) and telephone completion of patient-completed International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) modules by comparison with corresponding data collected using conventional paper-and-pencil methods. Methods: Men and women, attending urology outpatients complaining of LUTS, were randomised to one of three groups which determined the order in which they completed three administrations of the same questionnaire: paper, iPad and telephone. Four ICIQ questionnaires were evaluated: ICIQ-MLUTS, ICIQ-LUTSqol, ICIQ-OABqol and ICIQ-UI SF. Results: From August 2012 to October 2014 a total of 448 out of 491 (91%) recruits completed the first two administrations and were included in the analysis. Three hundred forty-eight out of 491 (71%) completed the phone administration. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Kappa statistic were calculated where appropriate between completed pairs of administrations. Mean ICC correlations were high (>0.8) between paper and iPad administrations. Paired paper and phone administrations were less well correlated, although still high (mean ICC>0.75). This may be partly due to the practical limitation that the phone interview was completed up to a week later than the initial two administrations. There was no evidence that potential moderator effects (gender, age and experience with computers or touch screen devices) significantly affected overall reliability of scores between administrations. Conclusions: We can recommend the interchangeable use of ICIQ electronic or paper based questionnaires in a clinical or research setting. Self-report is preferable to telephone delivery where possible.
Citation
Parke, S. E., Uren, A. D., Uren, A., Cotterill, N., Parke, S. E., & Abrams, P. (2017). Psychometric equivalence of electronic and telephone completion of the ICIQ modules. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 36(5), 1342-1349. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23103
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 29, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 11, 2016 |
Publication Date | Jun 1, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Jun 22, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 22, 2018 |
Journal | Neurourology and Urodynamics |
Print ISSN | 0733-2467 |
Electronic ISSN | 1520-6777 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 36 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 1342-1349 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23103 |
Keywords | patient reported outcomes, questionnaire, validation, electronic equivalence, ICIQ |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/909451 |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23103 |
Additional Information | Additional Information : This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [Uren, A., Cotterill, N., Parke, S. E. and Abrams, P. (2016) Psychometric equivalence of electronic and telephone completion of the ICIQ modules. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 36 (5). pp. 1342-1349. ISSN 0733-2467], which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23103. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. |
Files
Uren et al Neuro Urol manuscript revised clean 060716 NC.pdf
(345 Kb)
PDF
Uren et al Neuro Urol manuscript revised clean 060716 NC.docx
(55 Kb)
Document
You might also like
Client–led research and intervention development: Exploring people with Multiple Sclerosis’ experiences of psychological therapies
(2023)
Presentation / Conference
CONfidence: developing an app to promote bladder and bowel health
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search