Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Psychometric equivalence of electronic and telephone completion of the ICIQ modules

Parke, Sophie E.; Uren, Alan D.; Uren, Alan; Cotterill, Nikki; Parke, Sophie E; Abrams, Paul

Psychometric equivalence of electronic and telephone completion of the ICIQ modules Thumbnail


Authors

Sophie E. Parke

Alan D. Uren

Alan Uren

Profile Image

N Nikki Cotterill Nikki.Cotterill@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Long Term Conditions (Continence Care)

Sophie E Parke

Paul Abrams



Abstract

© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Aims: To assess the equivalence of touch-screen (hand-held iPad) and telephone completion of patient-completed International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) modules by comparison with corresponding data collected using conventional paper-and-pencil methods. Methods: Men and women, attending urology outpatients complaining of LUTS, were randomised to one of three groups which determined the order in which they completed three administrations of the same questionnaire: paper, iPad and telephone. Four ICIQ questionnaires were evaluated: ICIQ-MLUTS, ICIQ-LUTSqol, ICIQ-OABqol and ICIQ-UI SF. Results: From August 2012 to October 2014 a total of 448 out of 491 (91%) recruits completed the first two administrations and were included in the analysis. Three hundred forty-eight out of 491 (71%) completed the phone administration. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Kappa statistic were calculated where appropriate between completed pairs of administrations. Mean ICC correlations were high (>0.8) between paper and iPad administrations. Paired paper and phone administrations were less well correlated, although still high (mean ICC>0.75). This may be partly due to the practical limitation that the phone interview was completed up to a week later than the initial two administrations. There was no evidence that potential moderator effects (gender, age and experience with computers or touch screen devices) significantly affected overall reliability of scores between administrations. Conclusions: We can recommend the interchangeable use of ICIQ electronic or paper based questionnaires in a clinical or research setting. Self-report is preferable to telephone delivery where possible.

Citation

Parke, S. E., Uren, A. D., Uren, A., Cotterill, N., Parke, S. E., & Abrams, P. (2017). Psychometric equivalence of electronic and telephone completion of the ICIQ modules. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 36(5), 1342-1349. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23103

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 29, 2016
Online Publication Date Aug 11, 2016
Publication Date Jun 1, 2017
Deposit Date Jun 22, 2018
Publicly Available Date Jun 22, 2018
Journal Neurourology and Urodynamics
Print ISSN 0733-2467
Electronic ISSN 1520-6777
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 36
Issue 5
Pages 1342-1349
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23103
Keywords patient reported outcomes, questionnaire, validation, electronic equivalence, ICIQ
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/909451
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23103
Additional Information Additional Information : This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [Uren, A., Cotterill, N., Parke, S. E. and Abrams, P. (2016) Psychometric equivalence of electronic and telephone completion of the ICIQ modules. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 36 (5). pp. 1342-1349. ISSN 0733-2467], which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23103. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

Files








You might also like



Downloadable Citations