Overcoming hurdles in translating visual search research between the lab and the field

Cain, Matthew S.; Clark, Kait; Adamo, Stephen H.; Mitroff, Stephen R.

Abstract

Research in visual search can be vital to improving performance in careers such as radiology and airport security screening. In these applied, or "field," searches, accuracy is critical, and misses are potentially fatal; however, despite the importance of performing optimally, radiological and airport security searches are nevertheless flawed. Extensive basic research in visual search has revealed cognitive mechanisms responsible for successful visual search as well as a variety of factors that tend to inhibit or improve performance. Ideally, the knowledge gained from such laboratory-based research could be directly applied to field searches, but several obstacles stand in the way of straightforward translation; the tightly controlled visual searches performed in the lab can be drastically different from field searches. For example, they can differ in terms of the nature of the stimuli, the environment in which the search is taking place, and the experience and characteristics of the searchers themselves. The goal of this chapter is to discuss these differences and how they can present hurdles to translating lab-based research to field-based searches. Specifically, most search tasks in the lab entail searching for only one target per trial, and the targets occur relatively frequently, but field searches may contain an unknown and unlimited number of targets, and the occurrence of targets can be rare. Additionally, participants in lab-based search experiments often perform under neutral conditions and have no formal training or experience in search tasks; conversely, career searchers may be influenced by the motivation to perform well or anxiety about missing a target, and they have undergone formal training and accumulated significant experience searching. This chapter discusses recent work that has investigated the impacts of these differences to determine how each factor can influence search performance. Knowledge gained from the scientific exploration of search can be applied to field searches but only when considering and controlling for the differences between lab and field.

Citation

Cain, M. S., Clark, K., Adamo, S. H., & Mitroff, S. R. (2012). Overcoming hurdles in translating visual search research between the lab and the field. In M. D. Dodd, & J. H. Flowers (Eds.), The Influence of Attention, Learning, and Motivation on Visual Search (147-181). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4794-8_7

• Publication Date: Jan 1, 2012
• Deposit Date: Aug 3, 2017
• Publicly Available Date: Jun 19, 2019
• Print ISSN: 0146-7875
• Peer Reviewed: Not Peer Reviewed
• Pages: 147-181
• Book Title: The Influence of Attention, Learning, and Motivation on Visual Search
• ISBN: 9781461447931
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4794-8_7
• Keywords: applied visual search, rare-target visual search, multiple-target visual search, satisfaction of search, motivation, anxiety, expertise, training, learning, radiology
• Public URL: https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/950570
• Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4794-8_7