Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Periorbital and orbital cellulitis in children: A survey of emergency physicians and analysis of clinical practice guidelines across the PERUKI network

Tolhurst-Cleaver, Meriel; Evans, Jordan; Waterfield, Thomas; Adamson, Jonathan; Marlow, Robin; Lyttle, Mark D.; Roland, Damian

Periorbital and orbital cellulitis in children: A survey of emergency physicians and analysis of clinical practice guidelines across the PERUKI network Thumbnail


Authors

Meriel Tolhurst-Cleaver

Jordan Evans

Thomas Waterfield

Jonathan Adamson

Robin Marlow

Damian Roland



Abstract

Background: Due to limited evidence to guide management of periorbital cellulitis (POC), we surveyed current practice and assessed quality and consistency of local clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to highlight future research priorities. Methods: A web-based survey was sent to a designated emergency physician (who clinically assesses children) at Paediatric Emergency Research United Kingdom and Ireland (PERUKI) sites between 23 November 2018 to 22 January 2019. A nominated site lead offered one response as a department-wide perspective on admission, severity assessment, treatment, disposition and specialty consultation request. Sites shared their CPG. These were compared using a standardised data collection tool, and quality assessed using Standardised Reporting Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) criteria. Survey responses were also compared against CPG recommendations. Results: 83% (49/59) institutions invited submitted an individual survey response. 67% of responding sites had a CPG and 63% (31/49) submitted these. CPG quality was poor (mean 6.7/35 RIGHT criteria). 21 different severity markers were identified across CPGs. Most CPGS recommend investigations for severe disease, yet 23% (7/31) advise blood culture universally. 90% of CPGs advise discharge with oral antibiotics for milder cases, yet 86% of respondents reported departmental admission of all patients with POC. Nearly all respondents included proptosis, systemically unwell and visual disturbance as indications for admission but differed regarding importance of other signs. Conclusions: We demonstrated variation in practice across the PERUKI network in assessment of severity and management of POC. CPGs vary in recommendations, and clinical practice appears to differ from CPGs. Guidelines were generally of poor quality when compared against RIGHT standards.

Citation

Tolhurst-Cleaver, M., Evans, J., Waterfield, T., Adamson, J., Marlow, R., Lyttle, M. D., & Roland, D. (2022). Periorbital and orbital cellulitis in children: A survey of emergency physicians and analysis of clinical practice guidelines across the PERUKI network. Emergency Medicine Journal, 39, 766-770. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2021-211713

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 9, 2022
Online Publication Date Mar 9, 2022
Publication Date Sep 20, 2022
Deposit Date Apr 4, 2022
Publicly Available Date Apr 5, 2022
Journal Emergency Medicine Journal
Print ISSN 1472-0205
Electronic ISSN 1472-0213
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 39
Pages 766-770
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2021-211713
Keywords Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine; General Medicine; Emergency Medicine
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/9279177
Publisher URL https://emj.bmj.com/content/39/10/766

Files


Peri-orbital and Orbital cellulitis in children - a survey of Emergency Physicians and analysis of clinical practice guidelines across the PERUKI network. (524 Kb)
PDF

Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This article has been accepted for publication in Emergency Medicine Journal , 2022, following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2021-211713. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Reuse of this manuscript version (excluding any databases, tables, diagrams, photographs and other images or illustrative material included where a another copyright owner is identified) is permitted strictly pursuant to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0)




You might also like



Downloadable Citations