Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Subverting utopias|Dangerous dialogue: Inquiry in experiential teaching and learning

Page, Margaret; Sanger, Colston

Authors

Margaret Page

Colston Sanger



Abstract

The struggle to create adequate conditions for teaching and learning can become a utopian project, one in which competing visions of the just society are played out in microcosm. Within the academy, a variety of postgraduate and equivalent management education programmes based on experiential learning and social values offer an alternative to the more traditional MBA. These programmes are often identified with specific communities of practice and tend to reproduce historical oppositions between them, offering few opportunities for cross community dialogue. Moreover, such programmes often adopt strategies to defend their values and practices from dilution, particularly where there are increasing internal and external pressures to adopt instrumental approaches to education. Yet these defensive strategies can block development and growth, leading to cultures that sabotage learning from experience and encourage cult-like dynamics.

This working paper invites exploration of what it could mean to take up a role as a new member of staff in such an experiential learning programme. Through a series of vignettes, it reflects on the tensions experienced by the authors when seeking to revitalize inquiry within a programme with a humanistic pedagogy and ideology. Crucially, as Daniel Barenboim has suggested, to be recognized and accepted in role necessitated listening to, and accepting the legitimacy of, the ‘narrative of the other.

Citation

Page, M., & Sanger, C. (2007). Subverting utopias|Dangerous dialogue: Inquiry in experiential teaching and learning. Organisational and Social Dynamics, 7(2), 234-252

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 12, 2007
Publication Date Jan 1, 2007
Deposit Date Mar 24, 2016
Journal Organisational & Social Dynamics
Print ISSN 1474-2780
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 7
Issue 2
Pages 234-252
Keywords action inquiry, co-inquiry, difference, group relations, humanistic, relational psychoanalysis, management education
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/1033884
Publisher URL http://www.karnacbooks.com/JournalDetail.asp?ID=2



Downloadable Citations