Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Higher quality of life and lower depression for people on art in Uganda as compared to a community control group

Seeley, Janet; Martin, Faith; Russell, Steve

Higher quality of life and lower depression for people on art in Uganda as compared to a community control group Thumbnail


Authors

Janet Seeley

Faith Martin Faith.Martin@uwe.ac.uk
Wallscourt Fellow in Wellbeing and Mental Wealth

Steve Russell



Abstract

Provision of antiretroviral treatment (ART) to people living with HIV (PLWH) has increased globally. Research measuring whether ART restores subjective well-being to "normal" levels is lacking, particularly in resource limited settings. The study objectives are to compare quality of life and depression symptoms for PLWH on ART to a general community population and to explore factors to explain these differences, including socio-economic status and the impact of urban or rural residence. PLWH on ART (n = 263) were recruited from ART delivery sites and participants not on ART (n = 160) were recruited from communities in Wakiso District, Uganda. Participants were interviewed using the translated World Health Organisation Quality of Life brief measure, the Hopkins Symptom Checklist depression section, and questions about socioeconomic status, residence as urban or rural and, for PLWH on ART, self-reported adherence and use of HIV counselling. Compared to the community sample and controlling for location of residence, PLWH on ART had significantly higher quality of life (QOL) for physical, psychological and environment domains, but not the social domain. These differences were not due to socio-economic status alone. Depression scores were significantly lower for PLWH on ART. Both comparisons controlled for the effect of location of residence. People on ART self-reported high adherence and the majority had used HIV counselling services. Our findings show better QOL amongst PLWH on ART compared to a general community sample, which cannot be explained solely by differences in socio-economic status nor location of residence. The general community sample results point towards the challenges of life in this setting. Access to health services may underpin this difference and further research should explore this finding, in addition to identification of psychological mechanisms that relate to better QOL. ART provision infrastructure has clear benefits. Further work should consider sustainability and replication for other health conditions. © 2014 Martin et al.

Citation

Seeley, J., Martin, F., & Russell, S. (2014). Higher quality of life and lower depression for people on art in Uganda as compared to a community control group. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e105154. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105154

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 27, 2014
Online Publication Date Aug 29, 2014
Publication Date Aug 29, 2014
Deposit Date Sep 18, 2019
Publicly Available Date Sep 18, 2019
Journal PLoS ONE
Electronic ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 9
Issue 8
Pages e105154
DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105154
Keywords General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; General Agricultural and Biological Sciences; General Medicine
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/3069714

Files

Higher Quality of Life and Lower Depression for People on ART in Uganda as Compared to a Community Control Group (206 Kb)
PDF

Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
C 2014 Martin et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.




You might also like



Downloadable Citations