Antje Lindenmeyer
The psychosocial impact of living with an ocular prosthesis
Lindenmeyer, Antje; Jenkinson, Elizabeth; Harcourt, Diana; Moss, Tim; Clarke, Sally Ann; Newell, Rob; Newman, Stanton; Clarke, Alex; Charlton, Rodger; McBain, Hayley; Byron-Daniel, James; Williams, Emma; White, Paul; Walsh, Eleanor; Thompson, Andrew; Saul, Krysia; McBain, Hayley B.; Ezra, Daniel G.; Rose, Geoffrey E.; Newman, Stanton P.
Authors
Elizabeth Jenkinson Elizabeth2.Jenkinson@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Health Psychology
Diana Harcourt Diana2.Harcourt@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Appearance Research
Tim Moss Tim.Moss@uwe.ac.uk
Director of PGR Studies and Associate Professor
Sally Ann Clarke
Rob Newell
Stanton Newman
Alex Clarke
Rodger Charlton
Hayley McBain
James Byron-Daniel James.Byron-Daniel@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Health Psychology
Emma Williams
Paul White Paul.White@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Applied Statistics
Eleanor Walsh
Andrew Thompson
Krysia Saul
Hayley B. McBain
Daniel G. Ezra
Geoffrey E. Rose
Stanton P. Newman
Abstract
Objective: Many patients are satisfied with their ocular prosthesis, but some describe problems with social interactions, body image and self-esteem. Although both clinical practice and research suggest that the severity of a disfiguring condition does not predict distress, there has been little research with patients living with an ocular prosthesis. The objective was to explore the psychological impact of living with an artificial eye or cosmetic shell and determine the relationship between psychological well-being and clinical and psychosocial factors. Methods: A cross-sectional study between March and September 2008 at the ocular prosthesis clinic of Moorfields Eye Hospital, UK. The primary outcome measures were mood as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and appearance-related social anxiety and social avoidance, as measured by the Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS24). Results: Mean scores on the HADS and DAS24 were within normal range, but a considerable proportion of participants were experiencing significant levels of distress. Psychosocial adjustment was unrelated to most clinical and demographic variables, but was associated with a series of cognitive processes. Conclusions: Psychological variables, rather than clinical or demographic factors, are associated with how a patient adjusts to wearing an ocular prosthesis. Such factors might be amenable to change through psychosocial intervention. © 2014 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. All rights reserved.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Feb 1, 2014 |
Deposit Date | Aug 20, 2015 |
Journal | Orbit |
Print ISSN | 0167-6830 |
Electronic ISSN | 1744-5108 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 33 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 39-44 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3109/01676830.2013.851251 |
Keywords | anxiety, depression, ophthalmology, prosthesis, visible difference |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/825557 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01676830.2013.851251 |
Additional Information | Corporate Creators : Members of the Appearance Research Collaboration |
Contract Date | Nov 15, 2016 |
You might also like
The psychosocial impact of ptosis as a symptom of myasthenia gravis: A qualitative study
(2014)
Journal Article
CBT for appearance anxiety
(2014)
Book
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search