Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The outcome and cost-effectiveness of nurse-led care in people with rheumatoid arthritis: A multicentre randomised controlled trial

Ndosi, Mwidimi; Lewis, Martyn; Hale, Claire; Quinn, Helen; Ryan, Sarah; Emery, Paul; Bird, Howard; Hill, Jackie

Authors

Profile Image

Dr Mwidimi Ndosi Mwidimi.Ndosi@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Nursing Rheumatology

Martyn Lewis

Claire Hale

Helen Quinn

Sarah Ryan

Paul Emery

Howard Bird

Jackie Hill



Abstract

Objective To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of nurse-led care (NLC) for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods In a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial, the assessment of clinical effects followed a non-inferiority design, while patient satisfaction and cost assessments followed a superiority design. Participants were 181 adults with RA randomly assigned to either NLC or rheumatologist-led care (RLC), both arms carrying out their normal practice. The primary outcome was the disease activity score (DAS28) assessed at baseline, weeks 13, 26, 39 and 52; the non-inferiority margin being DAS28 change of 0.6. Mean differences between the groups were estimated controlling for covariates following per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) strategies. The economic evaluation (NHS and healthcare perspectives) estimated cost relative to change in DAS28 and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) derived from EQ5D.Results Demographics and baseline characteristics of patients under NLC (n=91) were comparable to those under RLC (n=90). Overall baseline-adjusted difference in DAS28 mean change (95% CI) for RLC minus NLC was-0.31 (-0.63 to 0.02) for PP and-0.15 (-0.45 to 0.14) for ITT analyses. Mean difference in healthcare cost (RLC minus NLC) was £710 (-£352, £1773) and-£128 (-£1263, £1006) for PP and ITT analyses, respectively. NLC was more cost-effective with respect to cost and DAS28, but not in relation to QALY utility scores. In all secondary outcomes, significance was met for non-inferiority of NLC. NLC had higher 'general satisfaction' scores than RLC in week 26.Conclusions The results provide robust evidence to support non-inferiority of NLC in the management of RA.

Citation

Ndosi, M., Lewis, M., Hale, C., Quinn, H., Ryan, S., Emery, P., …Hill, J. (2014). The outcome and cost-effectiveness of nurse-led care in people with rheumatoid arthritis: A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 73(11), 1975-1982. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203403

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 9, 2013
Online Publication Date Oct 5, 2014
Publication Date Nov 1, 2014
Journal Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Print ISSN 0003-4967
Electronic ISSN 1468-2060
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 73
Issue 11
Pages 1975-1982
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203403
Keywords cost-effectiveness, nurse-led care, rheumatoid arthritis, multicentre randomised controlled trial
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/808096
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203403