Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Evaluating the participation of junior members and patient and healthcare professionals representatives in EULAR task forces: Results from an international survey

Juge, Pierre-Antoine; Kragstrup, Tue Wenzel; Perez-Garcia, Luis Fernando; Frãzao-Mateus, Elsa; Makri, Souzi; Boyd, Peter; Primdahl, Jette; Ferreira, Ricardo J.O.; Vliet Vlieland, Theodora P.M.; Ndosi, Mwidimi; Kiltz, Uta; Landewé, Robert; Lauper, Kim; de Hooge, Manouk

Evaluating the participation of junior members and patient and healthcare professionals representatives in EULAR task forces: Results from an international survey Thumbnail


Authors

Pierre-Antoine Juge

Tue Wenzel Kragstrup

Luis Fernando Perez-Garcia

Elsa Frãzao-Mateus

Souzi Makri

Peter Boyd

Jette Primdahl

Ricardo J.O. Ferreira

Theodora P.M. Vliet Vlieland

Profile Image

Dr Mwidimi Ndosi Mwidimi.Ndosi@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Nursing Rheumatology

Uta Kiltz

Robert Landewé

Kim Lauper

Manouk de Hooge



Abstract

Objective
European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) task forces (TF) requires participation of ≥2 junior members, a health professional in rheumatology (HPR) and two patient research partners for the development of recommendations or points to consider. In this study, participation of these junior and representative members was compared with the one of traditional TF members (convenor, methodologist, fellow and expert TF members).

Methods
An online survey was developed and emailed to previous EULAR TF members. The survey comprised multiple-choice, open-ended and 0–100 rating scale (fully disagree to fully agree) questions.

Results
In total, 77 responded, 48 (62%) women. In total, 46 (60%) had participated as a junior or representative TF member. Most junior/representative members reported they felt unprepared for their first TF (10/14, 71%). Compared with traditional members, junior/representative members expressed a significantly higher level of uncertainty about their roles within the TF (median score 23 (IQR 7.0–52.0) vs 7 (IQR 0.0–21.0)), and junior/representative members felt less engaged by the convenor (54% vs 71%). Primary factors that facilitated interaction within a TF were experience, expertise and preparation (54%), a supportive atmosphere (42%) and a clear role (12%).

Conclusion
Juniors, patients and HPR experience various challenges when participating in a EULAR TF. These challenges differ from and are generally less pronounced than those experienced by traditional TF members. The convenor should introduce the participants to the tasks, emphasise the value of their contributions and how to prepare accordingly for the TF meeting.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 23, 2024
Online Publication Date Jun 12, 2024
Publication Date Jun 12, 2024
Deposit Date Jun 17, 2024
Publicly Available Date Jun 18, 2024
Journal RMD Open
Electronic ISSN 2056-5933
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 10
Issue 2
Article Number e004177
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004177
Keywords Qualitative Research, Health Services Research, Patient Care Team, Humans, Rheumatology, Adult, Middle Aged, Health Personnel, Advisory Committees, Europe, Female, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/12056161
PMID 38866591

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations