Benjamin Seeliger
Are the 1990 American College of Rheumatology vasculitis classification criteria still valid?
Seeliger, Benjamin; Sznajd, Jan; Robson, Joanna C.; Judge, Andrew; Craven, Anthea; Grayson, Peter C.; Suppiah, Ravi S.; Watts, Richard A.; Merkel, Peter A.; Luqmani, Raashid A.
Authors
Jan Sznajd
Jo Robson Jo.Robson@uwe.ac.uk
Consultant Associate Professor in Rheumatology
Andrew Judge
Anthea Craven
Peter C. Grayson
Ravi S. Suppiah
Richard A. Watts
Peter A. Merkel
Raashid A. Luqmani
Abstract
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. Objectives. Advances in diagnostic techniques have led to better distinction between types of vasculitis, potentially affecting the utility of the 1990 ACR classification criteria for vasculitis. This study tested the performance of these criteria in a contemporary vasculitis cohort. Methods. The Diagnosis and Classification in Vasculitis Study provided detailed clinical, serological, pathological and radiological data from patients with primary systemic vasculitis and clinical context-specific comparator conditions. Fulfilment of six ACR criteria sets and their diagnostic performance was evaluated in patients with a given type of vasculitis and its comparator conditions. Results. Data from 1095 patients with primary systemic vasculitis and 415 with comparator conditions were available. For classification, sensitivities and specificities for ACR classification criteria were, respectively, 81.1% and 94.9% for GCA; 73.6% and 98.3% for Takayasu's arteritis; 65.6% and 88.7% for granulomatosis with polyangiitis; 57.0% and 99.8% for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis; 40.6% and 87.8% for polyarteritis nodosa; 28.9% and 88.5% for microscopic polyangiitis; and 72.7% and 96.3% for IgA-vasculitis. Overall sensitivity was 67.1%. Of cases identified by their respective criteria, 16.9% also met criteria for other vasculitides. Diagnostic specificity ranged from 64.2 to 98.9%; overall, 113/415 comparators (27.2%) fulfilled at least one of the ACR classification criteria sets. Conclusion. Since publication of the ACR criteria for vasculitis, the sensitivity for each type of vasculitis, except GCA, has diminished, although the specificities have remained high, highlighting the need for updated classification criteria.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 28, 2017 |
Publication Date | Jul 1, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Sep 12, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 31, 2018 |
Journal | Rheumatology (United Kingdom) |
Print ISSN | 1462-0324 |
Electronic ISSN | 1462-0332 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 56 |
Issue | 7 |
Pages | 1154-1161 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kex075 |
Keywords | Churg–Strauss syndrome, Takayasu’s disease, anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody, giant cell arteritis, microscopic, polyangiitis, polyarteritis nodosa, vasculitis |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/890521 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kex075 |
Additional Information | Additional Information : This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Rheumatology following peer review. The version of record [Seeliger, B., Sznajd, J., Robson, J. C., Judge, A., Craven, A., Grayson, P. C., Suppiah, R. S., Watts, R. A., Merkel, P. A. and Luqmani, R. A. (2017) Are the 1990 American College of Rheumatology vasculitis classification criteria still valid? Rheumatology, 56 (7). pp. 1154-1161.] is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kex075. |
Contract Date | Sep 12, 2017 |
Files
ACR_MANUSCRIPT_RHEUMATOLOGY_accepted version.pdf
(1.4 Mb)
PDF
ACR_MANUSCRIPT_RHEUMATOLOGY_accepted version.docx
(221 Kb)
Document
You might also like
The OMERACT emerging leaders program: The good, the bad, and the future
(2019)
Journal Article
Update on outcome measure development in large-vessel vasculitis: Report from OMERACT 2018
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search