L Clark
Proper understanding of recurrent stress urinary incontinence treatment in women (PURSUIT): A randomised controlled trial of endoscopic and surgical treatment
Clark, L; Fitzgerald, B; Noble, Sian; MacNeill, Stephanie; Paramasivan, Sangeetha; Cotterill, Nikki; Hashim, Hashim; Jha, Swati; Toozs-Hobson, Phillip; Greenwell, T; Thiruchelvam, Nikesh; Agur, Wael; White, A; Garner, V; Cobos-Arrivabene, M; Clement, Clare; Cochrane, M; Liu, Y; Lewis, Amanda L; Taylor, J; Lane, J A; Drake, Marcus J; Pope, Caroline
Authors
B Fitzgerald
Sian Noble
Stephanie MacNeill
Sangeetha Paramasivan
N Nikki Cotterill Nikki.Cotterill@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Long Term Conditions (Continence Care)
Hashim Hashim
Swati Jha
Phillip Toozs-Hobson
T Greenwell
Nikesh Thiruchelvam
Wael Agur
A White
V Garner
M Cobos-Arrivabene
Clare Clement
M Cochrane
Y Liu
Amanda L Lewis
J Taylor
J A Lane
Marcus J Drake
Caroline Pope
Abstract
Background: Women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) experience urine leakage with physical activity. Currently, the interventional treatments for SUI are surgical, or endoscopic bulking injection(s). However, these procedures are not always successful, and symptoms can persist or come back after treatment, categorised as recurrent SUI. There are longstanding symptoms and distress associated with a failed primary treatment, and currently, there is no consensus on how best to treat women with recurrent, or persistent, SUI. Methods: A two-arm trial, set in at least 20 National Health Service (NHS) urology and urogynaecology referral units in the UK, randomising 250 adult women with recurrent or persistent SUI 1:1 to receive either an endoscopic intervention (endoscopic bulking injections) or a standard NHS surgical intervention, currently colposuspension, autologous fascial sling or artificial urinary sphincter. The aim of the trial is to determine whether surgical treatment is superior to endoscopic bulking injections in terms of symptom severity at 1 year after randomisation. This primary outcome will be measured using the patient-reported International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence - Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF). Secondary outcomes include assessment of longer-term clinical impact, improvement of symptoms, safety, operative assessments, sexual function, cost-effectiveness and an evaluation of patients’ and clinicians’ views and experiences of the interventions. Discussion: There is a lack of high-quality, randomised, scientific evidence for which treatment is best for women presenting with recurrent SUI. The PURSUIT study will benefit healthcare professionals and patients and provide robust evidence to guide further treatment and improve symptoms and quality of life for women with this condition. Trial registration: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number (ISRCTN) registry ISRCTN12201059. Registered on 09 January 2020.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 13, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 3, 2022 |
Publication Date | Aug 3, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Jul 19, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 4, 2022 |
Journal | Trials |
Print ISSN | 1745-6215 |
Publisher | BioMed Central |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 23 |
Issue | 1 |
Article Number | 628 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06546-9 |
Keywords | PURSUIT; Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence; Endoscopic Bulking Injections; Surgery; Colposuspension; Autologous Fascial Sling; Artificial Urinary Sphincter; Randomised Controlled Trial; International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire – Urin |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/9711106 |
Publisher URL | https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-022-06546-9 |
Files
Proper understanding of recurrent stress urinary incontinence treatment in women (PURSUIT): A randomised controlled trial of endoscopic and surgical treatment
(1.9 Mb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
You might also like
Can a PRO be adequate without assessing quality of life?
(2015)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Using the ICIQ validated bladder diary and questionnaires in lower urinary tract dysfunction
(2015)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search