A reappraisal of public engagement in Oxford during the pandemic: Three case studies

Farrell, Milly; Wilkinson, Clare

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the majority of public engagement with research work moving online. This shift to online engagement is likely to affect inclusivity and diversity in such events and this requires further consideration as a result of the pandemic. Through comparing case-studies both pre-dating and during the pandemic, we are able to discern areas for ongoing improvement and learning in the public engagement sphere. Main body: The public engagement work of the Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities has sought to include a broad discussion on its research from a range of demographics, attempting to be inclusive in the engagement work of the Centre. However such efforts have not always been successful and we reflect here on two different pre-pandemic ‘in-person’ case studies assessing public views on vaccination and medical data sharing. In contrast we compare these pre-pandemic activities to a fully online case study coordinated and completed during the pandemic. These three case studies are compared and assessed for evidence of their efficacy in a post-pandemic world. Conclusion: Research and public awareness benefit when multiple views are included in engagement events. Broader demographics enrich our ways of understanding societal responses to healthcare issues such as vaccination, data sharing and social responsibility. The move to online engagement as a result of the pandemic may open opportunities to widening engagement geographically, but it could also pose a threat to inclusivity with certain public groups on a more local level. Enabling access to online engagement is key, but considerations must be made regarding the new barriers created by a solely online world and the many groups of people inadvertently excluded from this work.

Citation

Farrell, M., & Wilkinson, C. (2022). A reappraisal of public engagement in Oxford during the pandemic: Three case studies. Research Involvement and Engagement, 8(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00343-z

• Journal Article Type: Commentary
• Acceptance Date: Mar 16, 2022
• Online Publication Date: Mar 28, 2022
• Publication Date: Mar 28, 2022
• Deposit Date: Mar 29, 2022
• Publicly Available Date: Mar 30, 2022
• Journal: Research Involvement and Engagement
• Print ISSN: 2056-7529
• Electronic ISSN: 2056-7529
• Publisher: BioMed Central
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 8
• Issue: 1
• Article Number: 10
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00343-z
• Keywords: General Health Professions; Health (social science)
• Public URL: https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/9269388
• Publisher URL: https://researchinvolvement.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40900-022-00343-z
• Additional Information: Received: 23 June 2021; Accepted: 16 March 2022; First Online: 28 March 2022; : ; : The case studies here draw on evaluation data either gathered by other organisations, or internal evaluations which did not require formal approval via the University of Oxford ethical approval process. Ethical procedures, including informed consent, were however adhered to in the gathering of data.; : Not applicable.; : Milly Farrell is employed by the Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford. Clare Wilkinson provides consultancy as a public engagement mentor to the Centre.