Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Rehabilitation provided to patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison of three different rheumatology clinics in Austria, Sweden and the UK from the perspectives of patients and health professionals

Prodinger, Birgit; Ndosi, Mwidimi; Nordenski�ld, Ulla; Stamm, Tanja; Persson, Gert; Andreasson, Ingrid; Lundgren-Nilsson, �sa

Rehabilitation provided to patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison of three different rheumatology clinics in Austria, Sweden and the UK from the perspectives of patients and health professionals Thumbnail


Authors

Birgit Prodinger

Profile image of Mwidimi Ndosi

Dr Mwidimi Ndosi Mwidimi.Ndosi@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Nursing Rheumatology

Ulla Nordenski�ld

Tanja Stamm

Gert Persson

Ingrid Andreasson

�sa Lundgren-Nilsson



Abstract

© 2015 The Authors. © 2015 Foundation of Rehabilitation Information. Objective: To explore patients' and health professionals' views of outpatient rehabilitation services for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in 3 different rheumatology sites across Europe. Methods: A qualitative multi-method study was conducted with patients and health professionals in Vienna (Austria), Gothenburg (Sweden) and Leeds (UK). Data collection was carried out during focus groups with patients and health professionals. Patients' hospital records were integrated into the analysis. Data were analysed for site and findings were compared across sites. Results: A total of 20 patients and 20 health professionals participated in 12 focus groups. Although the 3 sites were all publicly funded university clinics, there were differences between sites regarding the structure and content of rehabilitation services. The themes that emerged in the focus groups were: referrals; continuity in rehabilitation; information provided to patients; patients' organizations; documentation and communication amongst health professionals; interface between primary and specialist care; and prescription practices. Most themes were addressed at all 3 sites, but there were variations in the specifics within themes. Conclusion: Integration of patients' and health professionals' views on how rehabilitation services are coordinated and how (parts of) processes are set up elsewhere provide valuable information for the further optimization of rehabilitation services.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 10, 2014
Publication Date Jan 1, 2015
Deposit Date May 25, 2017
Publicly Available Date May 25, 2017
Journal Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Print ISSN 1650-1977
Electronic ISSN 1651-2081
Publisher Foundation for Rehabilitation Information
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 47
Issue 2
Pages 174-182
DOI https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1914
Keywords delivery of healthcare, rehabilitation, interdisciplinary communication, patient perspective, multi-centre study
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/807930
Publisher URL https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/html/10.2340/16501977-1914
Contract Date May 25, 2017