Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Evaluation of the Q Method as a public engagement tool in examining the preferences of residents in metal mining areas

Sardo, Ana Margarida; Sinnett, Danielle

Evaluation of the Q Method as a public engagement tool in examining the preferences of residents in metal mining areas Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

In this study, we describe and present an evaluation of how the Q Method was used to engage members of local communities, to examine how those living in former metal mining landscapes value their heritage and understand their preferences for the long-term management of mine waste. The evaluation focused on the participants' experiences, thoughts and views of the Q Method, as a method of collecting individual preferences. The Q Method is for discourse analysis, allowing a systematic analysis of the subjective perspectives of participants. This paper presents a small-scale evaluation of the Q Method. The results indicate that although this method is time-consuming (both for the researchers and for the participants) and demanding, it is a suitable and successful engagement strategy. The Q Method helped the participants feel that their opinion was being sought and valued, and allowed them to express their views on mining heritage in the context of their lives. The method was also a valuable tool in challenging the participants' views and it reinforced the complexity of the decision-making process.

Citation

Sardo, A. M., & Sinnett, D. (2020). Evaluation of the Q Method as a public engagement tool in examining the preferences of residents in metal mining areas. Frontiers in Communication, 5(55), https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00055

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 3, 2020
Online Publication Date Aug 11, 2020
Publication Date Aug 11, 2020
Deposit Date Jul 14, 2020
Publicly Available Date Aug 14, 2020
Journal Frontiers in Communication
Print ISSN 2297-900X
Electronic ISSN 2297-900X
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 5
Issue 55
DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00055
Keywords Q method, Q sort, Evaluation, Public Engagement, Consultation, Public perspectives, Preferences, Public consultation, Q-method
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/6167010
Publisher URL https://www.frontiersin...omm.2020.00055/abstract

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations