Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Simultaneous in vivo comparison of water-filled and air-filled pressure measurement catheters: Implications for good urodynamic practice

Gammie, A.; Bevan, W.; Ellis-Jones, J.; Gammie, Andrew; Bevan, B; Ellis-Jones, Julie; Abrams, P.; Gray, J.; Hassine, A.; Williams, J.; Hashim, H.

Authors

A. Gammie

W. Bevan

J. Ellis-Jones

Andrew Gammie

B Bevan

Julie Ellis-Jones

P. Abrams

J. Gray

A. Hassine

J. Williams

H. Hashim



Abstract

© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate whether the pressure readings obtained from air-filled catheters (AFCs) are the same as the readings from simultaneously inserted water-filled catheters (WFCs). It also aimed to make any possible recommendations for the use of AFCs to conform to International Continence Society (ICS) Good Urodynamic Practices (GUP). Methods: Female patients undergoing urodynamic studies in a single center had water-filled and air-filled catheters simultaneously measuring abdominal and intravesical pressure during filling with saline and during voiding. The pressures recorded by each system at each event during the test were compared using paired t-test and Bland-Altman analyses. Results: 62 patients were recruited, of whom 51 had pressures that could be compared during filling, and 23 during voiding. On average, the pressures measured by the two systems were not significantly different during filling and at maximum flow, but the values for a given patient were found to differ by up to 10 cmH2O. Conclusions: This study shows that AFCs and WFCs cannot be assumed to register equal values of pressure. It has further shown that even when the pdet readings are compared with their value at the start of a test, a divergence of values of up to 10 cmH2O remains. If AFCs are used, care must be taken to compensate for any pdet variations that occur during patient movement. Before AFCs are adopted, new normal values for resting pressures need to be developed to allow good quality AFC pressure readings to be made. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:926–933, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 7, 2015
Online Publication Date Aug 7, 2015
Publication Date Nov 1, 2016
Journal Neurourology and Urodynamics
Print ISSN 0733-2467
Electronic ISSN 1520-6777
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 35
Issue 8
Pages 926-933
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22827
Keywords air-filled, catheter, measurement, pressure, water-filled
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/909090
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.22827