Emma Jones
Quality of reporting on patient and public involvement within surgical research a systematic review
Jones, Emma; Williams-Yesson, Barbara; Hackett, Rowland; Staniszewska, Sophie; Evans, David; Francis, Nader
Authors
Barbara Williams-Yesson
Rowland Hackett
Sophie Staniszewska
David Evans David9.Evans@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Health Services Research
Nader Francis
Abstract
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Background: Recruitment difficulties are a well-reported concern in surgical literature, which may be improved by patient and public involvement (PPI). PPI within research has been defined as being conducted "with" or "by" patients or members of the public rather than being "about" or "for" them. However, the extent to which PPI is used within surgical research is unknown. Methods: Surgical literature was systematically reviewed using EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed. Search terms related to (i) patients, (ii) involvement, (iii) perioperative care, and (iv) impact. Quality of PPI reporting was evaluated using the GRIPP (Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and Public checklist and the guidelines developed by Wright and Foster. A patient representative advised on the purpose and analysis of this systematic review. Results: Eight articles described PPI in surgical trials to improve the identification of research topics, study design, recruitment, retention, and data collection. Quality of PPI reporting was suboptimal, as none of the articles provided a clear account of how PPI was conceptualized. Training and support for patients, their involvement in dissemination, and a critique of the limitations of PPI were not reported. However, it was not clear whether this represents an underutilization of PPI or purely suboptimal reporting in surgery.Conclusions: There is a paucity of surgical research reporting upon PPI, and the quality of reporting is low. Further research to define appropriate standards for reporting on PPI activities may facilitate broadening the utilization and impact of PPI in surgical research.
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 6, 2019 |
Journal | Annals of Surgery |
Print ISSN | 0003-4932 |
Electronic ISSN | 1528-1140 |
Publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 261 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 243-250 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000768 |
Keywords | surgical research, patient involvement, public involvement |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/838994 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000768 |
Additional Information | Additional Information : This is the accepted version of the article. |
Files
Prisma diagram - study selection.tif
(95 Kb)
Other
Table 4 pic.pdf
(176 Kb)
PDF
Table 4 pic.docx
(21 Kb)
Document
Table 3 pic.pdf
(300 Kb)
PDF
Table 3 pic.docx
(19 Kb)
Document
Table 2.pdf
(251 Kb)
PDF
Table 2.docx
(19 Kb)
Document
Table 1.pdf
(213 Kb)
PDF
Table 1.docx
(16 Kb)
Document
PPI systematic review -revised v8 submitted 22 3 14.pdf
(533 Kb)
PDF
PPI systematic review -revised v8 submitted 22 3 14.doc
(308 Kb)
Document
You might also like
Public involvement in research: Assessing impact through a realist evaluation
(2014)
Journal Article
Schools of public health
(2014)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search