Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Beam model development and clinical experience with RadCalc for treatment plan quality assurance in online adaptive workflow with an MR‐linac

Jelen, Urszula; Moutrie, Zoë; Aylward, Jack D; Jameson, Michael G

Beam model development and clinical experience with RadCalc for treatment plan quality assurance in online adaptive workflow with an MR‐linac Thumbnail


Authors

Urszula Jelen

Zoë Moutrie

Jack D Aylward

Michael G Jameson



Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this work was to report on the optimization, commissioning, and validation of a beam model using a commercial independent dose verification software RadCalc version 7.2 (Lifeline Software Inc, Tyler, TX, USA), along with 4 years of experience employing RadCalc for offline and online monitor unit (MU) verification on the Elekta Unity MR‐linac (MRL) for a range of clinical sites. Methods: Calculation settings and model parameters, including the Clarkson integration settings and radiation/light field offset, have been systematically examined and optimized, and pitfalls in the use of density inhomogeneity corrections and in off‐axis calculations were investigated and addressed. The resulting model was commissioned by comparing RadCalc calculations to measurements for a variety of cases, selected following relevant recommendations, ranging from simple fields in a water tank to end‐to‐end point dose measurements in an anthropomorphic phantom. Results: For simple geometries, the agreement was within 2%, and for complex geometries, within 5%. When validating against the Monaco (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) treatment planning system (TPS), for 39 clinical commissioning plans, the mean total point dose difference was −0.3 ± 0.8% (−2.0%–1.1%). Finally, when applied retrospectively to 4085 clinical plan calculations, the agreement with the TPS was 0.3 ± 1.1% (−4.8%–4.2%), with fail rates of 0.1% for total point dose (discrepancy > 4%) and 0.3% for individual fields (discrepancy > 10%). Conclusions: Improved calculation agreement with the TPS and therefore increased confidence in the online QA, opened the way for an automated and physics‐light independent MU verification workflow within our MRL program.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 5, 2025
Online Publication Date May 19, 2025
Publication Date Jul 31, 2025
Deposit Date May 21, 2025
Publicly Available Date May 21, 2025
Journal Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Print ISSN 1526-9914
Publisher Wiley Open Access
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 26
Issue 7
Article Number e70125
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70125
Keywords MR‐linac, RadCalc, patient specific quality assurance, independent MU verification, adaptive radiotherapy
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/14457249
Additional Information Received: 2024-09-27; Accepted: 2025-04-05; Published: 2025-05-19

Files

Beam model development and clinical experience with RadCalc for treatment plan quality assurance in online adaptive workflow with an MR‐linac (9.2 Mb)
PDF

Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.






You might also like



Downloadable Citations