Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Early experience with MR‐guided adaptive radiotherapy using a 1.5 T MR‐Linac: First 6 months of operation using adapt to shape workflow

de Leon, Jeremiah; Crawford, David; Moutrie, Zoë; Alvares, Stacy; Hogan, Louise; Pagulayan, Claire; Jelen, Urszula; Loo, Conrad; Aylward, Jack D; Condon, Kieran; Dunkerley, Nicolle; Heinke, Monique Y; Sampaio, Sandy; Simon, Kathy; Twentyman, Tania; Jameson, Michael G

Authors

Jeremiah de Leon

David Crawford

Zoë Moutrie

Stacy Alvares

Louise Hogan

Claire Pagulayan

Urszula Jelen

Conrad Loo

Jack D Aylward

Kieran Condon

Nicolle Dunkerley

Monique Y Heinke

Sandy Sampaio

Kathy Simon

Tania Twentyman

Michael G Jameson



Abstract

Introduction
The magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MRL) offers improved soft tissue visualization to guide daily adaptive radiotherapy treatment. This manuscript aims to report initial experience using a 1.5 T MRL in the first 6 months of operation, including training, workflows, timings and dosimetric accuracy.

Methods
All staff received training in MRI safety and MRL workflows. Initial sites chosen for treatment were stereotactic and hypofractionated prostate, thoraco-abdomino-pelvic metastasis, prostate bed and bladder. The Adapt To Shape (ATS) workflow was chosen to be the focus of treatment as it is the most robust solution for daily adaptive radiotherapy. A workflow was created addressing patient suitability, simulation, planning, treatment and peer review. Treatment times were recorded breaking down into the various stages of treatment.

Results
A total of 37 patients were treated and 317 fractions delivered (of which 313 were delivered using an ATS workflow) in our initial 6 months. Average treatment times over the entire period were 50 and 38 min for stereotactic and non-stereotactic treatments respectively. Average treatment times reduced each month. The average difference between reference planned and ionization chamber measured dose was 0.0 ± 1.4%.

Conclusion
The MRL was successfully established in an Australian setting. A focus on training and creating a detailed workflow from patient selection, review and treatment are paramount to establishing new treatment programmes.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 17, 2021
Online Publication Date Oct 12, 2021
Publication Date Feb 1, 2022
Deposit Date Aug 30, 2024
Journal Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
Print ISSN 1754-9477
Electronic ISSN 1754-9485
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 66
Issue 1
Pages 138-145
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13336
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/12830013