Preksha Kuppanda
National audit of patient reported experience of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer pathways
Kuppanda, Preksha; Hermans, Louisa; Uren, Alan; Cotterill, Nikki; Rowe, Edward; Narahari, Krishna; Dickinson, Andrew; Rigby, Jeannie; Aning, Jonathan
Authors
Louisa Hermans
Alan Uren
N Nikki Cotterill Nikki.Cotterill@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Long Term Conditions (Continence Care)
Edward Rowe
Krishna Narahari
Andrew Dickinson
Jeannie Rigby
Jonathan Aning
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to measure and describe the national patient experience of radical cystectomy (RC) pathways in the UK using the validated Cystectomy‐Pathway Assessment Tool (C‐PAT). Patients and Methods: A cohort of 1081 patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer, between 1 January 2021 and 31 July 2022 at 33 UK cystectomy centres, returned completed C‐PAT responses. SPSS was employed for data summary statistics, including median, interquartile range, Mann Whitney U test or Chi‐square test with a 95% confidence interval to assess statistical significance between potentially associated variables. Open‐text responses in the C‐PAT tool were analysed and coded using NVivo software. Results: In this cohort, the greatest perceived delay in the RC pathway, reported by 19% of patients (n = 208), was at the GP consultation to first hospital referral stage with suspected bladder cancer. Around 10% of patients perceived delays at each of the other stages in their pathway. Cancer nurse specialist (CNS) contact was strongly associated with an improved patient experience (p < 0.001); however, 9.5% of patients reported that they were not assigned a cancer nurse specialist in their pathway. Overall, 96% (n = 1028) reported their experience of RC pathway care to be good or excellent. There were no significant differences in reported patient experience found between cystectomy centres. Conclusion: This audit demonstrates the feasibility of measuring patient experience of RC pathways at scale. The C‐PAT tool demonstrated utility in identifying specific pathway areas for quality improvement. Overall UK patients report a high quality pathway experience. A focus on improving the referral pathway between primary and secondary care is necessary.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 17, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 19, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Aug 29, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 29, 2024 |
Journal | BJUI Compass |
Print ISSN | 2688-4526 |
Electronic ISSN | 2688-4526 |
Publisher | Wiley Open Access |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.422 |
Keywords | multicentre outcome audit, bladder cancer, PREM, cystectomy, PROM |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/12808596 |
Files
National audit of patient reported experience of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer pathways
(518 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Longitudinal and idiographic methods of developing and evaluating tailored psychological interventions for people with MS: Findings from a pilot study and future directions
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Identifying the key determinants of a community pharmacy based bladder and bowel service
(2024)
Journal Article
The role of community pharmacy in the promotion of continence care: A systematic review
(2024)
Journal Article
CONfidence: Developing an app to promote bladder and bowel health
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search