Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Invasive urodynamic investigations in the management of women with refractory overactive bladder symptoms (FUTURE) in the UK: A multicentre, superiority, parallel, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Abdel-Fattah, Mohamed; Chapple, Christopher; Cooper, David; Breeman, Suzanne; Bell-Gorrod, Helen; Kuppanda, Preksha; Guerrero, Karen; Dixon, Simon; Cotterill, Nikki; Ward, Karen; Hashim, Hashim; Monga, Ash; Brown, Karen; Drake, Marcus; Gammie, Andrew; Mostafa, Alyaa; Bruce, Rebecca; Bell, Victoria; Kennedy, Christine; Evans, Suzanne; MacLennan, Graeme; Norrie, John

Invasive urodynamic investigations in the management of women with refractory overactive bladder symptoms (FUTURE) in the UK: A multicentre, superiority, parallel, open-label, randomised controlled trial Thumbnail


Authors

Mohamed Abdel-Fattah

Christopher Chapple

David Cooper

Suzanne Breeman

Helen Bell-Gorrod

Preksha Kuppanda

Karen Guerrero

Simon Dixon

Profile image of Nikki Cotterill

N Nikki Cotterill Nikki.Cotterill@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Long Term Conditions (Continence Care)

Karen Ward

Hashim Hashim

Ash Monga

Karen Brown

Marcus Drake

Andrew Gammie

Alyaa Mostafa

Rebecca Bruce

Victoria Bell

Christine Kennedy

Suzanne Evans

Graeme MacLennan

John Norrie



Abstract

Overactive bladder is a common problem affecting women worldwide, with a negative effect on their social and professional lives. Before considering invasive treatments, guidelines recommend urodynamics to identify detrusor overactivity. However, the clinical-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of urodynamics has never been robustly assessed in this cohort of women. We aimed to compare the clinical-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of urodynamics plus comprehensive clinical assessment (CCA) versus CCA only in the management of women with refractory overactive bladder symptoms. We did a multicentre, superiority, parallel, open-label, randomised controlled trial in 63 UK hospitals. Women aged 18 years or older with refractory overactive bladder or urgency predominant mixed urinary incontinence, with failed conservative management and being considered for invasive treatment, were randomly assigned (1:1) to urodynamics plus CCA versus CCA only. Assignment used an internet-based application with stratified random permuted blocks and site and baseline diagnosis as stratum. Primary outcome was participant-reported success at the last follow-up timepoint, measured by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement at 15 months after randomisation. Primary economic outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained modelled over the participants lifetime. Analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered with ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN63268739). Between Nov 6, 2017, and March 1, 2021, 1099 participants were randomly assigned to urodynamics plus CCA (n=550) or CCA only (n=549). At the final follow-up timepoint, participant-reported success rates of "very much improved" and "much improved" were not superior in the urodynamics plus CCA group (117 [23·6%] of 496) versus the CCA-only group (114 [22·7%] of 503; adjusted odds ratio 1·12 [95% CI 0·73-1·74]; p=0·60). Serious adverse events were low and similar between groups. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £42 643 per QALY gained. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed urodynamics had a 34% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY gained, which reduced further when extrapolated over the patient's lifetime. In women with refractory overactive bladder or urgency predominant mixed urinary incontinence, the participant-reported success in the urodynamics plus CCA group was not superior to the CCA-only group, and urodynamics was not cost-effective at the £20 000 per QALY gained threshold. UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © Crown Copyright © 2025 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.]

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 6, 2024
Online Publication Date Mar 22, 2025
Publication Date Mar 29, 2025
Deposit Date Apr 25, 2025
Publicly Available Date Apr 25, 2025
Journal Lancet (London, England)
Print ISSN 01406736
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 405
Issue 10484
Pages 1057-1068
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2824%2901886-5
Keywords Humans, United Kingdom, Adult, Quality of Life, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Urodynamics, Middle Aged, Urinary Bladder, Overactive - therapy - economics - physiopathology, Treatment Outcome, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Aged
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/14302999

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations