Ema L Swingwood
The use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation in invasively ventilated critically ill adults
Swingwood, Ema L; Stilma, Willemke; Tume, Lyvonne N; Cramp, Fiona; Voss, Sarah; Bewley, Jeremy; Ntoumenopoulos, George; Schultz, Marcus J; Scholte, Wilma; Reimer, Op; Paulus, Frederique; Rose, Louise
Authors
Willemke Stilma
Lyvonne N Tume
Fiona Cramp Fiona.Cramp@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Long Term Conditions
Sarah Voss Sarah.Voss@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Emergency and Critical Care
Jeremy Bewley
George Ntoumenopoulos
Marcus J Schultz
Wilma Scholte
Op Reimer
Frederique Paulus
Louise Rose
Abstract
Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) is traditionally used in the neuromuscular popula-tion. There is growing interest of MI-E use in invasively ventilated critically ill adults. We aimed to map current evidence on MI-E use in invasively ventilated critically ill adults. Two authors independently searched electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL via the Ovid platform; PROSPERO; Cochrane Library; ISI Web of Science; and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform between January 1990–April 2021. Inclusion criteria were (1) adult critically ill invasively ventilated subjects, (2) use of MI-E, (3) study design with original data, and (4) published from 1990 onward. Data were extracted by 2 authors independently using a bespoke extraction form. We used Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to appraise risk of bias. Theoretical Domains Framework was used to interpret qualitative data. Of 3,090 citations identi-fied, 28 citations were taken forward for data extraction. Main indications for MI-E use during invasive ventilation were presence of secretions and mucus plugging (13/28, 46%). Perceived contraindications related to use of high levels of positive pressure (18/28, 68%). Protocolized MI-E settings with a pressure of ±40 cm H2O were most commonly used, with detail on timing, flow, and frequency of prescription infrequently reported. Various outcomes were re-intubation rate, wet sputum weight, and pulmonary mechanics. Only 3 studies reported the occurrence of adverse events. From qualitative data, the main barrier to MI-E use in this subject group was lack of knowledge and skills. We concluded that there is little consistency in how MI-E is used and reported, and therefore, recommendations about best practices are not possible.
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 10, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | May 24, 2022 |
Publication Date | Aug 1, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Jun 8, 2022 |
Journal | Respiratory Care |
Print ISSN | 0020-1324 |
Electronic ISSN | 1943-3654 |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 67 |
Issue | 8 |
Pages | 1043-1057 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.09704 |
Keywords | mechanical insufflation-exsufflation; CoughAssist; ICU; extubation; airway clearance; physiotherapy; weaning |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/9619446 |
Publisher URL | https://rc.rcjournal.com/content/early/2022/05/24/respcare.09704 |
Related Outputs
You might also like
The biology of cancer-related fatigue: a review of the literature
(2015)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search