Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation in invasively ventilated critically ill adults

Swingwood, Ema L; Stilma, Willemke; Tume, Lyvonne N; Cramp, Fiona; Voss, Sarah; Bewley, Jeremy; Ntoumenopoulos, George; Schultz, Marcus J; Scholte, Wilma; Reimer, Op; Paulus, Frederique; Rose, Louise

Authors

Ema L Swingwood

Willemke Stilma

Lyvonne N Tume

Fiona Cramp Fiona.Cramp@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Long Term Conditions

Sarah Voss Sarah.Voss@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Emergency and Critical Care

Jeremy Bewley

George Ntoumenopoulos

Marcus J Schultz

Wilma Scholte

Op Reimer

Frederique Paulus

Louise Rose



Abstract

Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) is traditionally used in the neuromuscular popula-tion. There is growing interest of MI-E use in invasively ventilated critically ill adults. We aimed to map current evidence on MI-E use in invasively ventilated critically ill adults. Two authors independently searched electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL via the Ovid platform; PROSPERO; Cochrane Library; ISI Web of Science; and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform between January 1990–April 2021. Inclusion criteria were (1) adult critically ill invasively ventilated subjects, (2) use of MI-E, (3) study design with original data, and (4) published from 1990 onward. Data were extracted by 2 authors independently using a bespoke extraction form. We used Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to appraise risk of bias. Theoretical Domains Framework was used to interpret qualitative data. Of 3,090 citations identi-fied, 28 citations were taken forward for data extraction. Main indications for MI-E use during invasive ventilation were presence of secretions and mucus plugging (13/28, 46%). Perceived contraindications related to use of high levels of positive pressure (18/28, 68%). Protocolized MI-E settings with a pressure of ±40 cm H2O were most commonly used, with detail on timing, flow, and frequency of prescription infrequently reported. Various outcomes were re-intubation rate, wet sputum weight, and pulmonary mechanics. Only 3 studies reported the occurrence of adverse events. From qualitative data, the main barrier to MI-E use in this subject group was lack of knowledge and skills. We concluded that there is little consistency in how MI-E is used and reported, and therefore, recommendations about best practices are not possible.

Journal Article Type Review
Acceptance Date Feb 10, 2022
Online Publication Date May 24, 2022
Publication Date Aug 1, 2022
Deposit Date Jun 8, 2022
Journal Respiratory Care
Print ISSN 0020-1324
Electronic ISSN 1943-3654
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 67
Issue 8
Pages 1043-1057
DOI https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.09704
Keywords mechanical insufflation-exsufflation; CoughAssist; ICU; extubation; airway clearance; physiotherapy; weaning
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/9619446
Publisher URL https://rc.rcjournal.com/content/early/2022/05/24/respcare.09704