Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A comparison of analytical methods for the two group pre- post design

Allis, Vanessa; White, Paul

A comparison of analytical methods for the two group pre- post design Thumbnail


Authors

Vanessa Allis

Paul White Paul.White@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Applied Statistics



Abstract

Simulation demonstrates that for a two group randomized design ANCOVA is more powerful than the gain score approach

For ANCOVA with an interaction term the model with pre scores X as a covariate is more powerful than the model with X + Y as the covariate

In ANCOVA (with or without an interaction term) there is no power advantage to be had by reversing the roles of X and Y in the model

In ANCOVA reversing the roles of X+Y and X-Y might have a power advantage but the advantage is less than that observed in the models not using X+Y

The results above are for when the correlation coefficient (

Presentation Conference Type Poster
Conference Name UWE Student Conference
Start Date Apr 10, 2017
End Date Apr 10, 2017
Acceptance Date Apr 10, 2017
Publicly Available Date Jun 7, 2019
Peer Reviewed Not Peer Reviewed
Keywords comparison, analytical methods, two group pre-post design
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/889343
Additional Information Title of Conference or Conference Proceedings : UWE Student Conference, 2017