Vanessa Allis
A comparison of analytical methods for the two group pre- post design
Allis, Vanessa; White, Paul
Abstract
Simulation demonstrates that for a two group randomized design ANCOVA is more powerful than the gain score approach
For ANCOVA with an interaction term the model with pre scores X as a covariate is more powerful than the model with X + Y as the covariate
In ANCOVA (with or without an interaction term) there is no power advantage to be had by reversing the roles of X and Y in the model
In ANCOVA reversing the roles of X+Y and X-Y might have a power advantage but the advantage is less than that observed in the models not using X+Y
The results above are for when the correlation coefficient (
Presentation Conference Type | Poster |
---|---|
Conference Name | UWE Student Conference |
Start Date | Apr 10, 2017 |
End Date | Apr 10, 2017 |
Acceptance Date | Apr 10, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 7, 2019 |
Peer Reviewed | Not Peer Reviewed |
Keywords | comparison, analytical methods, two group pre-post design |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/889343 |
Additional Information | Title of Conference or Conference Proceedings : UWE Student Conference, 2017 |
Files
UWE Conference 2017.pdf
(595 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Changes in attitudes towards telemedicine in acute burn care following the Covid-19 pandemic
(2024)
Journal Article
The inadvertently revealing statistic: A systemic gap in statistical training?
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search