Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A qualitative feasibility study to inform a randomised controlled trial of fluid bolus therapy in septic shock

Jones, Nicola; Nadel, Simon; Peters, Mark J.; Harrison, David A.; Rowan, Kathryn M.; O'Hara, CB; Inwald, David; Canter, Ruth R.; Mouncey, Paul R.; Carter, Anjali; Lyttle, Mark D.; Woolfall, Kerry

A qualitative feasibility study to inform a randomised controlled trial of fluid bolus therapy in septic shock Thumbnail


Authors

Nicola Jones

Simon Nadel

Mark J. Peters

David A. Harrison

Kathryn M. Rowan

CB O'Hara

David Inwald

Ruth R. Canter

Paul R. Mouncey

Anjali Carter

Kerry Woolfall



Abstract

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. Objective The Fluids in Shock (FiSh) Trial proposes to evaluate whether restrictive fluid bolus therapy (10 mL/ kg) is more beneficial than current recommended practice (20 mL/kg) in the resuscitation of children with septic shock in the UK. This qualitative feasibility study aimed to explore acceptability of the FiSh Trial, including research without prior consent (RWPC), potential barriers to recruitment and participant information for a pilot trial. Design Qualitative interview study involving parents of children who had presented to a UK emergency department or been admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit with severe infection in the previous 3 years. Participants Twenty-one parents (seven bereaved) were interviewed 16 (median) months since their child’s hospital admission (range: 1–41). results All parents said they would have provided consent for the use of their child’s data in the FiSh Trial. The majority were unfamiliar with RWPC, yet supported its use. Parents were initially concerned about the change from currently recommended treatment, yet were reassured by explanations of the current evidence base, fluid bolus therapy and monitoring procedures. Parents made recommendations about the timing of the research discussion and content of participant information. Bereaved parents stated that recruiters should not discuss research immediately after a child’s death, but supported a personalised postal’opt-out’ approach to consent. conclusions Findings show that parents whose child has experienced severe infection supported the proposed FiSh Trial, including the use of RWPC. Parents’ views informed the development of the pilot trial protocol and site staff training. trial registration number ISRCTN15244462—results.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 12, 2017
Online Publication Date Aug 29, 2017
Publication Date Jan 1, 2018
Deposit Date Aug 14, 2017
Publicly Available Date Aug 29, 2017
Journal Archives of Disease in Childhood
Print ISSN 0003-9888
Electronic ISSN 1468-2044
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 103
Issue 1
Pages 28-32
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-312515
Keywords children, critical illness, medical ethics, qualitative research, sepsis
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/871940
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-312515
Contract Date Aug 14, 2017

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations