Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Inter-annotator agreement using the Conversation Analysis Modelling Schema, for dialogue

Duran, Nathan; Battle, Steve; Smith, Jim

Inter-annotator agreement using the Conversation Analysis Modelling Schema, for dialogue Thumbnail


Authors

Profile Image

Jim Smith James.Smith@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Interactive Artificial Intelligence



Abstract

We present the Conversation Analysis Modeling Schema (CAMS), a novel dialogue labeling schema that combines the Conversation Analysis concept of Adjacency Pairs, with Dialogue Acts. The aim is to capture both the semantic and syntactic structure of dialogue, in a format that is independent of the domain or topic, and which facilitates the computational modeling of dialogue. A labeling task undertaken by novice annotators is used to evaluate its efficacy on a selection of task-oriented and non-task-oriented dialogs, and to measure inter-annotator agreement. To deepen the “human-factors” analysis we also record and examine users’ self-reported confidence scores and average utterance annotation times. Inter-annotator agreement is shown to be higher for task-oriented dialogs than non-task-oriented, though the structure of the dialogue itself has a more significant impact. We further examine the assumptions around expected agreement for two weighted agreement coefficients, Alpha and Beta, and show that annotators assign labels using similar probability distributions, small variations can result in large differences in agreement values between biased and unbiased measures.

Citation

Duran, N., Battle, S., & Smith, J. (2022). Inter-annotator agreement using the Conversation Analysis Modelling Schema, for dialogue. Communication Methods and Measures, 16(3), 182-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.2020229

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 15, 2021
Online Publication Date Jan 17, 2022
Publication Date 2022-10
Deposit Date Mar 2, 2022
Publicly Available Date Mar 8, 2022
Journal Communication Methods and Measures
Print ISSN 1931-2458
Electronic ISSN 1931-2466
Publisher Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 16
Issue 3
Pages 182-214
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.2020229
Keywords Conversation Analysis, Inter-annotator Agreement, Annotation Schema, Dialogue
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/8584971
Additional Information Peer Review Statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope.; Aim & Scope: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=hcms20; Published: 2022-01-17

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations