Iain Brown
A working typology of response options to manage environmental change and their scope for complementarity using an Ecosystem Approach
Brown, Iain; Everard, Mark
Abstract
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. A diverse range of response options is available for decision-makers to manage environmental change and meet sustainability objectives. These can include inter alia: top-down statutory regulation and levies; bottom-up initiatives including quality assurance networks or community-based partnerships; formal incentives; and voluntary market-based schemes such as 'payments for ecosystem services' or offsetting. Each type of response option has a distinct set of characteristics, which suggests that they may be best suited to different contexts rather than presumed to be effective in all circumstances. These attributes are used to develop a working typology to help understand the strengths and weaknesses of different response types, particularly regarding adaptation to long-term change and handling of uncertainty. To facilitate this, response types are referenced from a socio-ecological systems perspective using a refined version of the DPSIR integrated assessment framework to incorporate ecosystem functions and services. This shows that some responses are more clearly associated with maintaining resilience of natural functions, whilst others are directed at human-defined services. The role of stakeholders in response options can also be distinguished such as comparing mandatory or voluntary initiatives. Polluter-pays approaches are therefore distinguished from beneficiary-pays approaches. The typology can therefore provide a working reference framework for recognising complementary rather than conflicting interventions, as guided by the holistic principles of the Ecosystem Approach.
Citation
Brown, I., & Everard, M. (2015). A working typology of response options to manage environmental change and their scope for complementarity using an Ecosystem Approach. Environmental Science and Policy, 52, 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.006
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Oct 1, 2015 |
Journal | Environmental Science and Policy |
Print ISSN | 1462-9011 |
Electronic ISSN | 1873-6416 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 52 |
Pages | 61-73 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.006 |
Keywords | response options, robust decision-making, typology, environmental change, ecosystem services, integrated assessment, policy appraisal |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/804982 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.006 |
Files
NEAFO typology paper BROWN AND EVERARD (FULL TEXT).docx
(1 Mb)
Document
NEAFO typology paper BROWN AND EVERARD %28FULL TEXT%29.pdf
(972 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Qualitative methods for ecologists and conservation scientists
(2018)
Journal Article
Non-native fishes in the Indian Himalaya: an emerging concern for freshwater scientists
(2017)
Journal Article
Optimising ecosystem services to deliver multiple benefits
(2017)
Journal Article