RIBA Horizons 2034 The Environmental Challenge: An Introduction
Moncaster, Alice
Authors
Alice Moncaster Alice.Moncaster@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Digital and Sustainable Construction
Abstract
The environmental challenge facing us is both vast and urgent.
Use of energy and materials is increasing globally, greenhouse gas emissions are going up rather than down, the devastating impacts of climate change are already being suffered from sub-Saharan Africa to the poles, and the crisis in global biodiversity is unprecedented.
Vested interests, lack of understanding, and inertia are compounding the problems. As Latour asks in Down to Earth: “How can we not feel inwardly undone by the anxiety of not knowing how to respond?” [1]
Architects and built environment professionals have a particular responsibility. As highlighted in the International Energy Agency and United Nations Environment Programme Global Status Report 2022, greenhouse gas emissions arising from heating, cooling and lighting our buildings are responsible for 27% of global emissions. [2] Constructing and maintaining those buildings emits an additional 10%, with construction of infrastructure responsible for another 10%. Our built environment, then, is responsible for almost half of all global emissions – and, by implication, so are its architects.
At the same time, urbanisation, more extreme weather, growing populations and increasing migration are exerting an ever-greater pressure on our cities. The need for resilient buildings to shelter us all in comfort and security from the heat and storms to come is only going to grow.
The only possible answer to the climate crisis is to recognise our global responsibility, even as the political mood swings towards nationalisation. How should architects respond professionally to both this responsibility and this demand, in the next ten years and beyond?
The current system of education and skills, manufacturers and supply chains, procurement and finance, and developers and design firms, is so unwieldy that it is no surprise that the construction industry is seen as one of the slowest to change. And yet change is happening. An understanding of the importance of improving energy efficiency is now widespread and enshrined in regulations across much of the world. The measurement and gradual reduction of embodied carbon in building materials is finally starting to catch up, with national regulations just introduced in the Scandinavian countries and spreading.
But professional training and practices still tend to reflect old siloes based on rigid divisions of knowledge and labour. They still respond to a conceptual framework which sees buildings and infrastructure as technologies made up of individual parts, rather than integrated socio-technical systems. This has too often produced battles rather than consensus: arguments over whether operational or embodied carbon is the most important, over heavy-weight versus lightweight structures, over demolition versus retention, and over densification versus low-rise.
Radical change – indeed revolution – is needed, and this is what RIBA Horizons 2034 is challenging us to achieve.
The four Horizons 2034 topics are overlapping and inter-connected. Degradation of the environment is unfairly experienced at both global and local scales, with economic systems increasingly protecting the rich at the expense of the poor and vulnerable. Population growth and migration add additional pressures. Technological innovation is often held out as the holy grail, and yet repeatedly fails to reduce carbon emissions, often instead producing unintended negative consequences.
Within The Environmental Challenge theme, we are considering mitigation, adaptation, biodiversity, and the role of engagement and activism.
Biodiversity and protecting the variety of life on Earth in all its forms is also crucial in ameliorating the impact of global warming on ecosystems and preventing local environmental degradation. However, driving change at a policy and an individual level requires engagement and activism in a cycle of continuous debate and lobbying. These areas are intrinsically linked.
So, this is how architects must respond. They must rethink the boundaries of their responsibilities and start a revolution. Revolution is needed all along the supply chain, to produce near-to-zero carbon products and buildings.
But revolution is also needed at the point at which projects are first imagined, at the point at which planning is approved or denied, throughout the design professions and the construction industry and within regional and national governments.
Building professionals must reconsider their role, not as great designers of new objects to be admired and consumed, but as servants of global communities who need more from their built environment than ever before.
And rather than working in siloes, they need to learn about and practice maths, art, humanity and understanding – and above all humility.
Change is needed in the ways that decisions are made, in the arguments that are openly had, those that are hidden, and those that are never discussed.
Every step of our approach to the built environment must be deconstructed, in order to reassemble it as one that is fit for the future, that minimises our impact as a species on the climate and on earth’s ecosystems, and that provides us with a built environment capable of sustaining our future on the planet.
