Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Challenges and enablers to implementation of the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme in primary care: A qualitative study

Jones, Bethan; Anchors, Zoe; Voss, Sarah; Walsh, Nicola

Challenges and enablers to implementation of the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme in primary care: A qualitative study Thumbnail


Authors

Bethan Jones

Zoe Anchors

Sarah Voss Sarah.Voss@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Emergency and Critical Care

Profile Image

Nicola Walsh Nicola.Walsh@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Knowledge Mobilisation & Muscul



Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) was set up to recruit 26 000 additional staff into general practice by 2024, with the aim of increasing patient access to appointments. Despite the potential benefits of integrating ARRS practitioners into primary care, their implementation has not always been straightforward. AIM: To explore the challenges and enablers to implementation of the ARRS including its impact on primary and secondary care systems. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative interview study with ARRS healthcare professionals and key professional stakeholders involved in staff education or scheme implementation across three integrated care systems in England. METHOD: Participants (n = 37) were interviewed using semi-structured individual or paired interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed using framework analysis until data saturation occurred. RESULTS: Using framework analysis, 10 categories were identified. Three were categorised as successes: staff valued but their impact unclear; multiple and certain roles maximise impact; and training hub support. Seven were categorised as challenges: scheme inflexibility; creating a sustainable workforce with career progression; managing scope and expectations; navigating supervision and roadmap progression; infrastructure and integration challenges; ARRS roles impact on wider systems; and tensions and perspectives of existing staff. CONCLUSION: Most ARRS staff felt valued, but the scheme broadened expertise available in primary care rather than reducing GP burden, which was originally anticipated. Some PCNs, especially those in areas of high deprivation, found it difficult to meet the population's needs as a result of the scheme's inflexibility, potentially leading to greater health inequalities in primary care. Recommendations are proposed to optimise the effective implementation of the primary care workforce model. Further research is required to explore administrative role solutions, further understand the impact of health inequalities, and investigate the wellbeing of ARRS staff.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 3, 2024
Online Publication Date Jan 16, 2024
Publication Date May 1, 2024
Deposit Date Jan 23, 2024
Publicly Available Date May 23, 2024
Journal The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
Print ISSN 0960-1643
Electronic ISSN 1478-5242
Publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 74
Issue 742
Pages e315-e322
DOI https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2023.0433
Keywords Primary care, Skill-mix, Additional Roles, Workforce
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/11624953

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations