Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Paramedic use of the ‘gold standards framework proactive identification guidance’ in screening patients for end of life: A mixed methods study with explanatory sequential design

Kirby, Kim; Liddiard, Cathy; Black, Sarah; Diaper, Alison; Goodwin, Laura; Pocock, Lucy; Proctor, Alyesha; Richards, Gemma; Taylor, Hazel; Voss, Sarah; Benger, Jonathan

Paramedic use of the ‘gold standards framework proactive identification guidance’ in screening patients for end of life: A mixed methods study with explanatory sequential design Thumbnail


Authors

Kim Kirby

Cathy Liddiard

Sarah Black

Laura Goodwin

Lucy Pocock

Gemma Richards

Hazel Taylor

Sarah Voss Sarah.Voss@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Emergency and Critical Care

Jonathan Benger



Abstract

Background
The role of the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) in End of Life (EOL) is often overlooked. The Gold Standards Framework Proactive Identification Guidance (GSFPIG) is an evidence-based screening tool to identify patients nearing EOL. We conducted a quantitative investigation using the GSFPIG to determine how often paramedics attend EOL patients with and without Advance Care Planning (ACP) in place followed by a qualitative interview study of paramedic perspectives on the usability and acceptability of the GSFPIG.

Methods
A mixed methods explanatory sequential design was used. Thirty-five paramedics were recruited from one EMS in England. Paramedics were trained in study procedures and asked to apply the GSFPIG to every patient they attended, aged 65 and over, and to record EOL status and ACP presence. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics.
Ten paramedics were purposively selected for an individual interview to explore their experiences of using the GSFPIG and the concept of paramedics referring EOL patients to the GP to implement ACP. Framework analysis was used to analyse interview data.

Results
Almost half (108/244;44.2%) of patients identified as EOL had no ACP in place. Where ACP was in place 37% of patients had a Do Not Attempt Resuscitation Order only, 50% a Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care or Treatment Escalation Plan and 13% unknown ACP type.

Analysis of ten paramedic interviews identified three key themes: Participant experiences of using the GSFPIG; Putting a screening and referral tool into practice; Paramedic views on ACPs.

Conclusions
Paramedics are well placed to identify patients who would benefit from an ACP. The GSFPIG has utility in EMS and paramedics found it easy to use. Paramedics report that good quality ACP allows them to provide treatment and care in line with patient preferences.

Presentation Conference Type Poster
Conference Name 999 EMS research forum annual conference
Start Date Jun 20, 2023
End Date Jun 21, 2023
Deposit Date Jun 22, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jul 5, 2023
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/10882865

Files








You might also like



Downloadable Citations