Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Kaleidoscope - Volume 217 , Issue 3

Tracy, Derek K.; Joyce, Dan W.; Albertson, Dawn N.; Shergill, Sukhwinder S.

Authors

Derek K. Tracy

Dan W. Joyce

Dawn N. Albertson

Sukhwinder S. Shergill



Abstract

We're all familiar with the mantra that while self-harm is common, suicide is ‘rare’ and prediction ‘difficult’. Can we at least have confidence in suicide-prevention interventions? A meta-analysis examined subsequent suicide attempts following a brief, single-encounter, suicide-prevention intervention in 14 studies covering 4270 individuals.Reference Doupnik, Rudd, Schmutte, Worsley, Bowden and McCarthy1 The majority of interventions were multi-aspect, typically including care coordination, safety planning, short-term follow-up contacts and a brief therapeutic intervention. The specific therapeutic component varied between studies, but included techniques informed variously by motivational interviewing, problem-solving and increasing likelihood of engaging with mental health services. The interventions did reduce subsequent suicide attempts, with a pooled odds ratio of 0.69; this equates to about 78 fewer suicide attempts in 2241 patients. There was increased linkage to clinical engagement with a 22.5% increase in attending follow-up, but interestingly, no association with any reduction in depressive symptoms. The findings are heartening, and we are reminded how a very significant number of people who die by suicide have contact with services in the days and weeks prior to their death. These findings encourage wider roll-out of such specific interventions across clinical services, and a need for clarification of the aspects that work best and in whom.

Journal Article Type Editorial
Online Publication Date Aug 28, 2020
Publication Date Sep 3, 2020
Deposit Date Jun 21, 2023
Journal British Journal of Psychiatry
Print ISSN 0007-1250
Electronic ISSN 1472-1465
Publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Peer Reviewed Not Peer Reviewed
Volume 217
Issue 3
Pages 532-533
DOI https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.145
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/10881790
Publisher URL https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/kaleidoscope/8DD4D48E9C495346DCE61C1E06448145