Mehdi Hosseinzadeh
Task scheduling mechanisms for fog computing: A systematic survey
Hosseinzadeh, Mehdi; Azhir, Elham; Lansky, Jan; Mildeova, Stanislava; Ahmed, Omed Hassan; Malik, Mazhar Hussain; Khan, Faheem
Authors
Elham Azhir
Jan Lansky
Stanislava Mildeova
Omed Hassan Ahmed
Dr Mazhar Malik Mazhar.Malik@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Director Intelligent Systems
Faheem Khan
Abstract
In the Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystem, some processing is done near data production sites at higher speeds without the need for high bandwidth by combining Fog Computing (FC) and cloud computing. Fog computing offers advantages for real-time systems that require high speed internet connectivity. Due to the limited resources of fog nodes, one of the most important challenges of FC is to meet dynamic needs in real-time. Therefore, one of the issues in the fog environment is the optimal assignment of tasks to fog nodes. An efficient scheduling algorithm should reduce various qualitative parameters such as cost and energy consumption, taking into account the heterogeneity of fog nodes and the commitment to perform tasks within their deadlines. This study provides a detailed taxonomy to gain a better understanding of the research issues and distinguishes important challenges in existing work. Therefore, a systematic overview of existing task scheduling techniques for cloud-fog environment, as well as their benefits and drawbacks, is presented in this article. Four main categories are introduced to study these techniques, including machine learning-based, heuristic-based, metaheuristic-based, and deterministic mechanisms. A number of papers are studied in each category. This survey also compares different task scheduling techniques in terms of execution time, resource utilization, delay, network bandwidth, energy consumption, execution deadline, response time, cost, uncertainty, and complexity. The outcomes revealed that 38% of the scheduling algorithms use metaheuristic-based mechanisms, 30% use heuristic-based, 23% use machine learning algorithms, and the other 9% use deterministic methods. The energy consumption is the most significant parameter addressed in most articles with a share of 19%. Finally, a number of important areas for improving the task scheduling methods in the FC in the future are presented.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 10, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | May 18, 2023 |
Publication Date | Jun 2, 2023 |
Deposit Date | Jun 7, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 7, 2023 |
Journal | IEEE Access |
Electronic ISSN | 2169-3536 |
Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 11 |
Article Number | 10129024 |
Pages | 50994-51017 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3277826 |
Keywords | Fog computing, cloud computing, task scheduling, methods, quality of service |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/10835811 |
Publisher URL | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10129024 |
Files
Task scheduling mechanisms for fog computing: A systematic survey
(6.2 Mb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Max-gain relay selection scheme for wireless networks
(2020)
Journal Article
IPv6 cryptographically generated address: Analysis, optimization and protection
(2021)
Journal Article
COVID-19 and learning styles: GCET as case study
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search