Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Evaluation of bioelectrical impedance analysis in measuring body fat in 6-to-12-year-old boys compared to air displacement plethysmography

Mahaffey, Ryan; Brown, Nicola; Cramp, Mary; Morrison, Stewart C.; Drechsler, Wendy I

Evaluation of bioelectrical impedance analysis in measuring body fat in 6-to-12-year-old boys compared to air displacement plethysmography Thumbnail


Authors

Ryan Mahaffey

Nicola Brown

Mary Cramp Mary.Cramp@uwe.ac.uk
School Director of Research and Enterprise

Stewart C. Morrison

Wendy I Drechsler



Abstract

Air displacement plethysmography (ADP) has been considered the 'standard' method to determine body fat in children due to superior validity and reliability compared to bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). However, ADP and BIA are used interchangeably despite few studies comparing measures of percentage body fat by ADP (%FMADP) with BIA (%FMBIA) in children with and without obesity. The objective of this study was to measure concurrent validity and reliability of %FMADP and %FMBIA in 6-to-12-year-old boys with and without obesity. Seventy-one boys (25 with obesity) underwent body composition assessment. Ten boys participated in intra-day reliability analysis. %FMADP was estimated by Bodpod using gender- and age-specific equations of body density. %FMBIA was estimated by a multi-frequency, hand-to-foot device using child-specific equations based on impendence. Validity was assessed by t-tests, correlation coefficients and limits of agreement (LoA); and reliability by technical error of measurement (TEM) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Compared to %FMADP, %FMBIA was significantly underestimated in the cohort (-3.4 ± 5.6%; effect size = 0.42), and in both boys with obesity (-5.2 ± 5.5%; ES = 0.90) and without obesity (-2.4 ± 5.5%; ES = 0.52). A strong, significant positive correlation was found between %FMADP and %FMBIA (r = 0.80). Across the cohort, LoA were 22.3%, and no bias was detected. For reliability, TEM of 0.65% and 0.55%, and ICCs of 0.93 and 0.95 for %FMBIA and %FMADP respectively. Whilst both %FMADP and %FMBIA are highly reliable methods, considerable differences indicated that the devices cannot be used interchangeably in boys 6-to-12-years-old.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 8, 2022
Online Publication Date Dec 23, 2022
Publication Date Sep 28, 2023
Deposit Date Jan 10, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jun 24, 2023
Journal British Journal of Nutrition
Print ISSN 0007-1145
Electronic ISSN 1475-2662
Publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 130
Issue 6
Pages 1098 - 1104
DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114522004019
Keywords Body composition, obesity, pediatric, concurrent validity, reliability
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/10252772
Publisher URL https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition/article/evaluation-of-bioelectrical-impedance-analysis-in-measuring-body-fat-in-6to12yearold-boys-compared-to-air-displacement-plethysmography/F21354FAD7B0D4A0BAC22AE979B6263A
Additional Information All authors contributed to conceptualisation, study design, data analysis, data interpretation, presentation of tables and figures, writing of the manuscript and manuscript revisions. Ryan Mahaffey collected data.

Files







You might also like



Downloadable Citations