Thea R. Cox
The ebb and flow of adaptive co-management: A longitudinal evaluation of a conservation conflict
Cox, Thea R.; Butler, James R.A.; Webber, Amanda D.; Young, Juliette C.
Authors
James R.A. Butler
Amanda D. Webber
Juliette C. Young
Abstract
Adaptive co-management (ACM) is an emerging approach to the governance of social-ecological systems, but there are few long-term assessments of its efficacy. This is especially true in conservation conflicts, where ACM can mitigate disputes between polarised stakeholders. We evaluated ACM that emerged in 2005 to address conflict between seal conservation and fisheries interests in the Moray Firth, Scotland. We interviewed 20 stakeholders in 2015, repeating a survey carried out in 2011 which applied an indicator framework to measure outcomes and pre-conditions for ACM to continue. In 2015, all but one of the 12 outcome indicators were positive, the exception being the conservation status of salmon. However, pre-conditions for ACM's continuation had weakened, with declines between 2005, 2011 and 2015. These were most marked for three indicators: leaders prepared to champion the process, presence of a bridging organisation or individual, and participation of all impacted stakeholders. The results show that ACM in this conservation conflict is dynamic. Perceived declines in salmon abundance and increases in seal numbers have renewed tensions amongst stakeholders, triggering a ‘revival’ phase of ACM initiated by fishery interests. Our study provides empirical evidence of ACM's fluid nature, and how resource crises can reignite ACM. We suggest that participatory evaluation is a potentially important early-warning mechanism that can identify remedial action and galvanise stakeholders to respond to the re-emergence of conflict.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 14, 2020 |
Publication Date | Dec 1, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Sep 6, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 7, 2022 |
Journal | Environmental Science & Policy |
Print ISSN | 1462-9011 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 114 |
Pages | 453-460 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.09.017 |
Keywords | Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Geography, Planning and Development, Evaluation Governance, Monitoring Participation, Salmon, Seals |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/9951411 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901120313368?via%3Dihub |
Additional Information | This article is maintained by: Elsevier; Article Title: The ebb and flow of adaptive co-management: A longitudinal evaluation of a conservation conflict; Journal Title: Environmental Science & Policy; CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.09.017; Content Type: article; Copyright: Crown Copyright © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
Files
The ebb and flow of adaptive co-management: A longitudinal evaluation of a conservation conflict
(1.9 Mb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Learning To Live With Fog Monsters
(2022)
Book
Failure is the greatest teacher: Embracing the positives of failure in primate conservation
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search