Dr Victoria Clarke Victoria.Clarke@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Qualitative & Critical Psychology
Navigating the messy swamp of qualitative research: Are generic reporting standards the answer?
Clarke, Victoria
Authors
Abstract
I remember feeling both surprised and excited when I heard that US qualitative psychologists were forming a grouping within the American Psychological Association (APA) – surprised, because at the time, from the outside, US psychology seemed irretrievably hostile to qualitative research, and especially to non-positivist qualitative research, and excited because this had to mean good things for the standing and visibility of qualitative research in psychology here in the UK. The Society for Qualitative Inquiry in Psychology (SQIP) was established within Division 5 of the APA in 2011. In 2013, SQIP established a task force – led by clinical psychologist, LGBT and psychotherapy researcher, Heidi Levitt – to develop recommendations for the design and review of qualitative research – the task force report was published in the Society’s journal Qualitative Psychology in 2017 (see Levitt et al. 2017). Around the same time an APA working group Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS–Qual), also led by Levitt, was tasked with developing reporting standards for qualitative research in psychology (see Levitt et al. 2018). This working group was formed in response to increasing use of qualitative methods in US psychology, and the challenges facing journal reviewers unfamiliar with qualitative methods, or a particular qualitative research tradition, to evaluate manuscripts submitted for publication. The resulting Reporting Standards were published in the American Psychologist in 2018 (Levitt et al. 2018). These have also been influential in UK psychology (see Shaw et al. 2019). Levitt has subsequently co-authored reporting standards for critical qualitative research (Levitt et al., 2021) and design and reporting standards for counselling and psychotherapy research (Levitt et al., 2021). Levitt’s new book Reporting Qualitative Research in Psychology: How to Meet APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards is intended to supplement and expand on the existing APA journal article reporting standards.
Journal Article Type | Book Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 1, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 18, 2021 |
Publication Date | Oct 2, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Aug 30, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 19, 2022 |
Journal | Qualitative Research in Psychology |
Print ISSN | 1478-0887 |
Electronic ISSN | 1478-0895 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis (Routledge) |
Peer Reviewed | Not Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 19 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 1004-1012 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2021.1995555 |
Keywords | General Psychology, Psychology, Qualitative Research |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/9776665 |
Publisher URL | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14780887.2021.1995555 |
Files
Navigating the messy swamp of qualitative research: Are generic reporting standards the answer?
(301 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Technical Information
This is the author’s accepted manuscript of an original article published by Taylor & Francis in 'Qualitative Research in Psychology' online first on the 21st of November 2021, available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/[Article DOI]. Clarke, V. (2022). Navigating the messy swamp of qualitative research: Are generic reporting standards the answer?. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(4), 1004-1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2021.1995555
Navigating the messy swamp of qualitative research: Are generic reporting standards the answer?
(36 Kb)
Document
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Technical Information
This is the author’s accepted manuscript of an original article published by Taylor & Francis in 'Qualitative Research in Psychology' online first on the 21st of November 2021, available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/[Article DOI]. Clarke, V. (2022). Navigating the messy swamp of qualitative research: Are generic reporting standards the answer?. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(4), 1004-1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2021.1995555
You might also like
Thematic analysis
(2024)
Book Chapter
Thematic analysis: A reflexive approach
(2024)
Book Chapter
Approaches to thematic analysis: Becoming a knowing researcher
(2023)
Book Chapter
The learning experiences of UK autistic university students during the Covid-19 pandemic
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search