Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Cross-cultural validation of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool in RA in 7 European countries

Vliet Vlieland, Thea P.M.; Zangi, Heidi A.; Ndosi, Mwidimi; Tennant, Alan; Bergsten, Ulrika; Kukkurainen, Marja Leena; Machado, Pedro; Vliet Vlieland, Thea PM; De La Torre-Aboki, Jenny; Zangi, Heidi A; Hill, Jackie

Cross-cultural validation of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool in RA in 7 European countries Thumbnail


Authors

Thea P.M. Vliet Vlieland

Heidi A. Zangi

Profile image of Mwidimi Ndosi

Dr Mwidimi Ndosi Mwidimi.Ndosi@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Rheumatology Nursing

Alan Tennant

Ulrika Bergsten

Marja Leena Kukkurainen

Pedro Machado

Thea PM Vliet Vlieland

Jenny De La Torre-Aboki

Heidi A Zangi

Jackie Hill



Abstract

Background: The Educational Needs Assessment Tool (the ENAT) is a 39-item patient questionnaire originally developed in the UK to assess educational needs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this study was to assess the cross-cultural validity of the ENAT in 7 European countries. Methods. The ENAT was translated into Dutch, Finnish, Norwegian, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish versions by using Beaton's cross-cultural adaptation process, and was completed by a convenience sample of patients with RA in each country. The generated country-specific data were assessed for construct validity and were then pooled and assessed for cross-cultural invariance using Rasch analysis. Results: Individual country-specific analysis showed adequate fit to the Rasch model after adjustment for local dependency within domains. When data from the different countries were pooled, the 39 items deviated significantly from Rasch model's expectations (X2 = 977.055, DF = 351, p = 0.000, PSI = 0.976). Again, most items within domains were found to be locally dependent, significantly affecting the fit. Consequently each domain was treated as a unit (i.e. testlet) and the ENAT was re-analysed as a seven-testlet scale resulting into a good fit to the Rasch model (X2 = 71.909; DF = 63; p = 0.207, PSI = 0.951). A test of strict unidimensionality confirmed that all domains contributed to measuring a single construct. Cross-cultural non-invariance was discounted by splitting domains for DIF maintaining an excellent fit to the Rasch model. This allowed calibration of the ENAT into an interval scale. Conclusion: The ENAT is a simple tool, which is a valid measure of educational needs of people with RA. Adjustment for cross-cultural non-invariance is available if data from the 7 European countries are to be pooled or compared. © 2011 Ndosi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 24, 2011
Publication Date May 26, 2011
Deposit Date May 26, 2017
Publicly Available Date May 26, 2017
Journal BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Print ISSN 1471-2474
Electronic ISSN 1471-2474
Publisher BioMed Central
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 12
Issue 1
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-110
Keywords cross-cultural validation, outcome research, patient education, Rasch Analysis, rheumatoid arthritis
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/962398
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-110
Contract Date May 26, 2017