Emma L. Bird
Behavior change techniques used to promote walking and cycling: A systematic review
Bird, Emma L.; Bird, Emma; Baker, Graham; Mutrie, Nanette; Ogilvie, David; Sahlqvist, Shannon; Powell, Jane
Authors
Emma Bird Emma.Bird@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Public Health
Graham Baker
Nanette Mutrie
David Ogilvie
Shannon Sahlqvist
Jane Powell Jane.Powell@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Public Health Economics
Abstract
Objective: Evidence on the effectiveness of walking and cycling interventions is mixed. This may be partly attributable to differences in intervention content, such as the cognitive and behavioral techniques (BCTs) used. Adopting a taxonomy of BCTs, this systematic review addressed two questions: (a) What are the behavior change techniques used in walking and cycling interventions targeted at adults? (b) What characterizes interventions that appear to be associated with changes in walking and cycling in adults? Method: Previous systematic reviews and updated database searches were used to identify controlled studies of individual-level walking and cycling interventions involving adults. Characteristics of intervention design, context, and methods were extracted in addition to outcomes. Intervention content was independently coded according to a 26-item taxon-omy of BCTs. Results: Studies of 46 interventions met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-one reported a statistically significant effect on walking and cycling outcomes. Analysis revealed substantial heterogeneity in the vocabulary used to describe intervention content and the number of BCTs coded. "Prompt self-monitoring of behavior" and "prompt intention formation" were the most frequently coded BCTs. Conclusion: Future walking and cycling intervention studies should ensure that all aspects of the intervention are reported in detail. The findings lend support to the inclusion of self-monitoring and intention formation techniques in future walking and cycling intervention design, although further exploration of these and other BCTs is required. Further investigation of the interaction between BCTs and study design characteristics would also be desirable. © 2013 American Psychological Association.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Aug 1, 2013 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 7, 2019 |
Journal | Health Psychology |
Print ISSN | 0278-6133 |
Electronic ISSN | 1930-7810 |
Publisher | American Psychological Association |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 32 |
Issue | 8 |
Pages | 829-838 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032078 |
Keywords | walking, cycling, intervention, review, behavior change |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/933789 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032078 |
Files
BCT_review_2013.pdf
(1.3 Mb)
PDF
Bird_et_al_2013_BCTreview_supp.pdf
(1.1 Mb)
PDF
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search