David Pontin
Family-witnessed resuscitation: focus group inquiry into UK student nurse experiences of simulated resuscitation scenarios
Pontin, David; Kenny, Gerard; Bray, Issy; Albarran, John
Authors
Gerard Kenny
Issy Bray Issy.Bray@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Public Health (Epidemiology)
John Albarran
Abstract
© Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. Aims To describe the impact of family members' presence on student nurse performance in a witnessed resuscitation scenario. To explore student nurses' attitudes to simulated family-witnessed resuscitation and their views about its place in clinical practice. Background Family-witnessed resuscitation remains controversial worldwide. Hospital implementation remains inconsistent despite professional organisation support. Systematic reviews of international literature indicate family members wish to be involved and consulted; healthcare professionals express concerns about being observed while resuscitating. Student nurse perspectives have not been addressed. Design Qualitative, focus groups. Methods Participants: UK university second-year student nurses (n=48) who participated in simulated resuscitation scenarios (family member absent, family member present but quiet or family member present but distressed). Data generation 2014: focus group interview schedule - five open-ended questions and probing techniques. Audio recordings transcribed, analysed thematically. Research ethics approval via University Research Ethics committee. Findings Overarching theme=students' sense making - making sense of situation (practically/professionally), of themselves (their skills/values) and of others (patients/family members). Students identify as important team leader allocating tasks, continuity of carer and number of nurses needed. Three orientations to practice are identified and explored - includes rule following, guidance from personal/proto-professional values and paternalistic protectionism. Discussion We explore issues of students' fluency of response and skills repertoire to support family-witnessed resuscitation; explanatory potential to account for the inconsistent uptake of family-witnessed resuscitation. Possible future lines of inquiry include family members' gaze as a motivational trigger, and management of guilt.
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 6, 2016 |
Publication Date | Sep 1, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Jun 13, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 27, 2016 |
Journal | BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning |
Print ISSN | 2056-6697 |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 2 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 73-77 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000115 |
Keywords | family witnessed resuscitation, simulation, resuscitation, qualitative research, student nurses |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/922477 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000115 |
Contract Date | Jun 13, 2016 |
Files
Pontin et al FWR qualitative paper BMJ Sim Tech Enhanced Learning june 2016.pdf
(490 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
South African critical care nurses' views on end-of-life decision-making and practices
(2014)
Journal Article
Family presence during resuscitation – The experiences and views of Polish nurses
(2018)
Journal Article
Getting published a practical guide- Part II
(2017)
Journal Article
Writing an effective conference abstract
(2017)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search