Matt R.K. Zeale
Mitigating the impact of Bats in historic churches: The response of Natterer's Bats Myotis nattereri to artificial roosts and deterrence
Zeale, Matt R.K.; Russo, Danilo; Zeale, Matt R. K.; Bennitt, Emily; Newson, Stuart E.; Packman, Charlotte; Browne, William J.; Harris, Stephen; Jones, Gareth; Stone, Emma
Authors
Danilo Russo
Matt R. K. Zeale
Emily Bennitt
Stuart E. Newson
Charlotte Packman
William J. Browne
Stephen Harris
Gareth Jones
Dr Emma Stone Emma4.Stone@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer Environmental Biology
Abstract
© 2016 Zeale et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Bats frequently roost in historic churches, and these colonies are of considerable conservation value. Inside churches, bat droppings and urine can cause damage to the historic fabric of the building and to items of cultural significance. In extreme cases, large quantities of droppings can restrict the use of a church for worship and/or other community functions. In the United Kingdom, bats and their roosts are protected by law, and striking a balance between conserving the natural and cultural heritage can be a significant challenge. We investigated mitigation strategies that could be employed in churches and other historic buildings to alleviate problems caused by bats without adversely affecting their welfare or conservation status. We used a combination of artificial roost provision and deterrence at churches in Norfolk, England, where significant maternity colonies of Natterer's bats Myotis nattereri damage church features. Radio-tracking data and population modelling showed that excluding M. nattereri from churches is likely to have a negative impact on their welfare and conservation status, but that judicious use of deterrents, especially high intensity ultrasound, can mitigate problems caused by bats. We show that deterrence can be used to move bats humanely from specific roosting sites within a church and limit the spread of droppings and urine so that problems to congregations and damage to cultural heritage can be much reduced. In addition, construction of bespoke roost spaces within churches can allow bats to continue to roost within the fabric of the building without flying in the church interior. We highlight that deterrence has the potential to cause serious harm toM. nattereri populations if not used judiciously, and so the effects of deterrents will need careful monitoring, and their use needs strict regulation.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 15, 2016 |
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Oct 11, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 11, 2018 |
Journal | PLoS ONE |
Electronic ISSN | 1932-6203 |
Publisher | Public Library of Science |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 11 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | e0146782 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146782 |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/915185 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146782 |
Contract Date | Oct 11, 2018 |
Files
journal.pone.0146782.PDF
(1.2 Mb)
PDF
You might also like
Assessing the impact of festival music on bat activity
(2023)
Journal Article
What drives bat activity at field boundaries?
(2022)
Journal Article
Lighting up our waterways: Impacts of a current mitigation strategy on Riparian bats
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search