Paul Lintott Paul.Lintott@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Conservation Science
Ecological impact assessments fail to reduce risk of bat casualties at wind farms
Lintott, Paul; Richardson, Suzanne; Hosken, David; Fensome, Sophie; Mathews, Fiona
Authors
Suzanne Richardson
David Hosken
Sophie Fensome
Fiona Mathews
Abstract
Demand for renewable energy is rising exponentially. While this has benefits in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, there may be costs to biodiversity [1]. Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) are the main tool used across the world to predict the overall positive and negative effects of renewable energy developments before planning consent is given, and the Ecological Impact Assessments (EcIAs) within them assess their species-specific effects. Given that EIAs are undertaken globally, are extremely expensive, and are enshrined in legislation, their place in evidence-based decision making deserves evaluation. Here we assess how well EIAs of wind-farm developments protect bats. We found they do not predict the risks to bats accurately, and even in those cases where high risk was correctly identified, the mitigation deployed did not avert the risk. Given that the primary purpose of an EIA is to make planning decisions evidence-based, our results indicate that EIA mitigation strategies used to date have been ineffective in protecting bats. In the future, greater emphasis should be placed on assessing the actual impacts post-construction and on developing effective mitigation strategies.
Journal Article Type | Letter |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 21, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 7, 2016 |
Publication Date | Nov 7, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Nov 10, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 10, 2017 |
Journal | Current Biology |
Print ISSN | 0960-9822 |
Electronic ISSN | 1879-0445 |
Publisher | Elsevier (Cell Press) |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 26 |
Issue | 21 |
Pages | R1135-R1136 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.003 |
Keywords | ecological impact assessments, fail, reduce risk, bat casualties, wind farms |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/906375 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.003 |
Contract Date | Nov 10, 2017 |
Files
Ecological impact assessments fail to reduce risk of bat casualties at wind farms.pdf
(72 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Assessing the impact of festival music on bat activity
(2023)
Journal Article
What drives bat activity at field boundaries?
(2022)
Journal Article
Lighting up our waterways: Impacts of a current mitigation strategy on Riparian bats
(2022)
Journal Article
Satellite megaclusters could fox night-time migrations
(2020)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search