Kim Bauters
Managing different sources of uncertainty in a BDI framework in a principled way with tractable fragments
Bauters, Kim; McAreavey, Kevin; Liu, Weiru; Hong, Jun; Godo, Llu�s; Sierra, Carles
Authors
Kevin McAreavey
Weiru Liu
Jun Hong Jun.Hong@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Artificial Intelligence
Llu�s Godo
Carles Sierra
Abstract
The Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) architecture is a practical approach for modelling large-scale intelligent systems. In the BDI setting, a complex system is represented as a network of interacting agents – or components – each one modelled based on its beliefs, desires and intentions. However, current BDI implementations are not well-suited for modelling more realistic intelligent systems which operate in environments pervaded by different types of uncertainty. Furthermore, existing approaches for dealing with uncertainty typically do not offer syntactical or tractable ways of reasoning about uncertainty. This complicates their integration with BDI implementations, which heavily rely on fast and reactive decisions. In this paper, we advance the state-of-the-art w.r.t. handling different types of uncertainty in BDI agents. The contributions of this paper are, first, a new way of modelling the beliefs of an agent as a set of epistemic states. Each epistemic state can use a distinct underlying uncertainty theory and revision strategy, and commensurability between epistemic states is achieved through a stratification approach. Second, we present a novel syntactic approach to revising beliefs given unreliable input. We prove that this syntactic approach agrees with the semantic definition, and we identify expressive fragments that are particularly useful for resource-bounded agents. Third, we introduce full operational semantics that extend Can, a popular semantics for BDI, to establish how reasoning about uncertainty can be tightly integrated into the BDI framework. Fourth, we provide comprehensive experimental results to highlight the usefulness and feasibility of our approach, and explain how the generic epistemic state can be instantiated into various representations.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 1, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 4, 2017 |
Publication Date | Apr 4, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Feb 14, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 15, 2017 |
Journal | Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research |
Print ISSN | 1076-9757 |
Electronic ISSN | 1943-5037 |
Publisher | AI Access Foundation |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 58 |
Pages | 731-755 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.5287 |
Keywords | BDI agents, online planning |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/889904 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1613/jair.5287 |
Additional Information | Additional Information : This is the pre-formatted version of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research |
Contract Date | Feb 14, 2017 |
Files
jair2017a.pdf
(553 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
A survey of location inference techniques on Twitter
(2015)
Journal Article
Privacy preserving record linkage in the presence of missing values
(2017)
Journal Article
A novel ensemble learning approach to unsupervised record linkage
(2017)
Journal Article
A collaborative multiagent framework based on online risk-aware planning and decision-making
(2017)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search