Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Insights into responsible education for sustainable development: The case of UWE, Bristol

Cicmil, Svetlana; Gough, Georgina; Hills, Sarah

Insights into responsible education for sustainable development: The case of UWE, Bristol Thumbnail


Authors

Georgina Gough Georgina.Gough@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Education for Sustainable Development



Abstract

© 2017 Elsevier Ltd In this paper, we argue that it is opportune to revisit profound questions about the purpose, nature and value of higher education in society at a juncture where the context of higher education has been significantly influenced by the global sustainability agenda and responsible management education imperatives (United Nations (UN) Principles of Responsible Management Education (PRME), UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), UN Global Compact, UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), etc.). We take Holman's (2000) work on models for management education and his recommendations as our point of departure in critically examining the practice of embedding ESD and UN PRME (as two complementary schemes) in our institution. We explore the nature and interrelationships of Holman's 5 axioms of management education (epistemic, pedagogical, management-as-practice, social, and organisational) in order to provide a reflective account of our experiences and elucidate deeper understandings of what responsible education for sustainable development may mean in practice. The arguments presented here are grounded in both practical theorising stemming from related literature and concrete empirical illustrations generated through our observations and reflections as participants (in our roles as PRME Leader, ESD champion and SD programme leader) in the PRME/ESD initiatives. We have demonstrated that embedding ESD responsibly across a HE institution is a complex, emerging, evolving and non-linear process of addressing simultaneously the curriculum content, power, structures, identity, values, and external checks and balances. Therefore, a critical attention is needed to all 5 axioms and assumptions that are at play and has to be facilitated by a combination of educational activism, informal academic collaboration, formal measures and reporting, and practical skills of maintaining legitimacy and ownership of creative and innovative pedagogic models while negotiating the meaning of those to align with the institutional priorities.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 2, 2017
Online Publication Date Jun 15, 2017
Publication Date Jul 1, 2017
Deposit Date Mar 13, 2017
Publicly Available Date Jun 15, 2018
Journal International Journal of Management Education
Print ISSN 1472-8117
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 15
Issue 2
Pages 293-305
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.002
Keywords UWE Bristol, education, sustainable development
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/884817
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.002
Contract Date Mar 13, 2017

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations