Phillip L Morgan
Trust in an autonomously driven simulator and vehicle performing maneuvers at a T-junction with and without other vehicles
Morgan, Phillip L; Williams, Craig; Flower, Jonathan; Alford, Chris; Parkin, John
Authors
Craig Williams
Dr Jonathan Flower Jonathan.Flower@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Research Fellow
Christopher Alford Chris.Alford@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Applied Psychology
John Parkin John.Parkin@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Transport Engineering
Contributors
Neville Stanton
Editor
Janusz Kacprzyk kacprzyk@ibspan.waw.pl
Editor
Abstract
Autonomous vehicle (AV) technology is developing rapidly. Level 3 automation assumes the user might need to respond to requests to retake control. Levels 4 (high automation) and 5 (full automation) do not require human monitoring of the driving task or systems [1]: the AV handles driving functions and makes deci-sions based on continuously updated information. A gradual switch in the role of the human within the vehicle from active controller to passive passenger comes with uncertainty in terms of trust, which will likely be a key barrier to acceptabil-ity, adoption and continued use [2]. Few studies have investigated trust in AVs and these have tended to use driving simulators with Level 3 automation [3, 4]. The current study used both a driving simulator and autonomous road vehicle. Both were operating at Level 3 autonomy although did not require intervention from the user; much like Level 4 systems. Forty-six participants completed road circuits (UK-based) with both platforms. Trust was measured immediately after different types of turns at a priority T-junction, increasing in complexity: e.g., driving left or right out of a T-junction; turning right into a T-junction; presence of oncoming/crossing vehicles. Trust was high across platforms: higher in the simulator for some events and higher in the road AV for others. Generally, and often irrespective of platform, trust was higher for turns involving an oncom-ing/crossing vehicle(s) than without traffic, possibly because the turn felt more controlled as the simulator and road AVs always yielded, resulting in a delayed maneuver. We also found multiple positive relationships between trust in automa-tion and technology, and trust ratings for most T-junction turn events across plat-forms. The assessment of trust was successful and the novel findings are im-portant to those designing, developing and testing AVs with users in mind. Un-dertaking a trial of this scale is complex and caution should be exercised about over-generalizing the findings.
Keywords: Autonomous Driving · Autonomous Simulator · Autonomous Vehi-cle · Trust · Acceptability
Publication Date | Jul 1, 2018 |
---|---|
Deposit Date | Jul 30, 2018 |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 786 |
Pages | 363-375 |
Series Title | Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing |
Series Number | 786 |
Book Title | Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, July 21–25, 2018, Loews Sapphire Falls Resort at Universal Studios, Orlando, Florida, USA |
ISBN | 9783319938844 |
Keywords | autonomous driving, autonomous simulator, autonomous vehicle, trust, acceptability |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/865324 |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1 |
Contract Date | Jul 30, 2018 |
You might also like
Does sleep restriction make driving with distractions worse? A comparison of listening to the radio, texting, eating and drinking whilst on a short 10 minute drive
(2015)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Energy drinks mixed with alcohol: Are there any risks?
(2015)
Journal Article
Energy drinks mixed with alcohol: Misconceptions, myths, and facts
(2012)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search