Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Clinicians’ perspectives on psychological distress and meeting patients’ support needs in rheumatology care settings

Silverthorne, C.; Daniels, J.; Thompson, M.; Robson, J.; Ndosi, M.; Swales, C.; Wilkins, K.; Dures, E.

Authors

J. Daniels

J. Robson

Profile image of Mwidimi Ndosi

Dr Mwidimi Ndosi Mwidimi.Ndosi@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Rheumatology Nursing

C. Swales

K. Wilkins

Emma Dures Emma2.Dures@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Rheumatology and Self-management



Abstract

Background: People with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) face challenges that include fluctuations in pain, fatigue and flares of disease activity, complex medical regimens, and decisions about when to seek clinical help with symptoms [1,2]. Evidence suggests levels of anxiety and depression are higher in people with IRDs compared to the general population [3]. Rheumatology teams report that psychologically distressed patients can have additional support needs and require more time. Patients' concerns include health-related anxiety and difficulty accepting the diagnosis. This group can have poor outcomes and poor adherence to treatments. However, little is currently known about optimal ways to meet these patients' support needs. Objectives: To understand rheumatology clinicians' perspectives on psychological distress in care settings with the long-term aim to develop a proposed model/pathway of support. Methods: Telephone interviews were conducted with members of UK rheumatology teams who have clinical experience with patients experiencing distress. The semi-structured interviews explored both ‘what happens now’ (current clinical practice) and ‘what should happen’ (acceptable models of future psychological support provision). The semi-structured format provided flexibility to probe more deeply and develop new lines of enquiry based on participants' responses. Results: Fourteen interviews were conducted with rheumatology clinicians including 2 consultants, 4 nurses, 1 physiotherapist, 4 occupational therapists, 2 clinical psychologists and 1 podiatrist. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Two main themes represent the data (Table 1). Conclusion: Distress can be obvious or hidden and cause issues for both patient and clinician. It can lead to poor engagement with care provision. Clinicians differ in their perceptions of distress and in their thresholds for dealing with distress and have described the inconsistency of support offered for distressed patients. They described the powerful link between physical and mental distress, the vicious cycle that can develop, and the benefits of incorporating a psychological approach to treatment. This study suggests psychological support should be embedded within the team as it is felt there is a need for speciality understanding and for patients' emotional wellbeing to consistently be given equal priority to their physical wellbeing. References: [1]Gettings L. Psychological well-being in rheumatoid arthritis: a review of the literature. Musculoskeletal care 2010;8(2):99-106. doi: 10.1002/msc.171 [published Online First: 2010/03/17] [2]Homer D. Addressing psychological and social issues of rheumatoid arthritis within the consultation: a case report. Musculoskeletal care 2005;3(1):54-9. doi: 10.1002/msc.26 [published Online First: 2006/10/17] [3]Isik A, Koca SS, Ozturk A, et al. Anxiety and depression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical rheumatology 2007;26(6):872-8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-006-0407-y [published Online First: 2006/08/31] Disclosure of Interests: None declared Table 1 Main Theme Sub-themes 1. ‘No one shoe fits all’ – the many manifestations of distress in patients. ‘I pick up on distress as increased emotion…tearfulness and sadness I suppose, but also frustration, anger...A lot of helplessness comments‘ 1. 'Distress can be quite emotive and quite obvious, but then it can also hide away'2. 'They're [patients] trying to manage their own conditions, but they're also trying to manage life' 2. ‘If Rheumatology could be interwoven with psychological principles’ – the need to attend to the psychological impact of IRDs, alongside the physical impact. ‘The physical and mental health side of things are so closely linked because one affects the other…after a while they [patients] don't really know what's affecting what‘ 1. 'Prioritising physical health…sometimes the stress gets not thought about'2. 'Make best use of everyone in the team to work with patients who are struggling'3. 'For the psychological side of things we don't measure anything about that at all'

Presentation Conference Type Conference Abstract
Conference Name EULAR European Congress of Rheumatology
Start Date Jun 2, 2021
End Date Jun 5, 2021
Acceptance Date Apr 1, 2021
Online Publication Date Jan 2, 2025
Publication Date 2021-06
Deposit Date May 29, 2021
Journal Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Print ISSN 0003-4967
Electronic ISSN 1468-2060
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 80
Issue S1
Pages 1021
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.2429
Keywords Immunology; General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; Immunology and Allergy; Rheumatology
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/7433673