Dr Lindsay Smith Lindsay6.Smith@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Physiotherapy (Academic Clinical Research)
Pilot study: Is a long‐term follow‐up service beneficial for patients undergoing revision hip replacement surgery?
Smith, Lindsay K.; Turner, Emma; Lenguerrand, Erik; Powell, Jane; Palmer, Shea
Authors
Emma Turner
Erik Lenguerrand
Jane Powell Jane.Powell@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Public Health Economics
Shea Palmer Shea.Palmer@uwe.ac.uk
Occasional Associate Lecturer - CHSS - HSW
Abstract
Purpose
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is highly successful but some patients will require later revision surgery. This pilot study evaluates the effects of long‐term follow‐up for patients undergoing revision hip replacement.
Methods
Consecutive patients undergoing aseptic revision of THA were recruited from a large orthopaedic unit to a single centre, observational study. Primary outcomes were changes in patient‐reported scores from pre‐revision to 12 months post‐surgery. Secondary outcomes were costs during hospital stay up to 6 months post‐revision. Participants were retrospectively allocated to two groups—those with regular orthopaedic review prior to revision (Planned revision) or those without (Unplanned revision).
Results
patients were recruited, 7 were unrevised, one incomplete baseline questionnaires. There were 25 planned and 19 unplanned revisions with no significant differences between groups at baseline. At 12 months, 34 complete data sets were available for analysis, 17 in each group. Change scores were analysed with Mann–Whitney U test; none reached statistical significance. There was a significant difference for length of stay: Planned group 5 days (2–22), Unplanned 11 days (3–86) (Mann–Whitney U test, p = 0.023). No significant differences found for theatre time or component costs. Resource costs post‐revision surgery are presented.
Conclusion
This pilot study indicates that some change in methods would be required for future work. The results show that there may be some financial benefit from providing long‐term follow‐up of THA but a larger study is needed to explore these findings and to discuss the impact on recommended guidelines.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 7, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 21, 2020 |
Publication Date | 2021-09 |
Deposit Date | Jun 21, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 21, 2021 |
Journal | Musculoskeletal Care |
Print ISSN | 1478-2189 |
Electronic ISSN | 1557-0681 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 19 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 259-268 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1521 |
Keywords | Hip replacement, surveillance, long-term, follow-up, healthcare services |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/6814591 |
Publisher URL | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/msc.1521 |
Additional Information | Received: 2020-10-01; Accepted: 2020-10-07; Published: 2020-10-21 |
Files
Pilot study: Is a long‐term follow‐up service beneficial for patients undergoing revision hip replacement surgery?
(432 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Public involvement in research: Assessing impact through a realist evaluation
(2014)
Journal Article
Health economic assessment of walking and cycling interventions in the physical environment: Interim findings from the iConnect study
(2014)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search