Emanuel Nunez Sardinha
Effectiveness and acceptance of assistive technologies for people with tetraplegia: A systematic review
Nunez Sardinha, Emanuel; Zook, Nancy; Western, David; Niyi-Odumosu, Faatihah; Ruiz Garate, Virginia; Munera, Marcela
Authors
Nancy Zook Nancy.Zook@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Psychology
David Western David.Western@uwe.ac.uk
Wallscourt Fellow in Health Technology
Dr Faatihah Niyi-Odumosu Faatihah.Niyi-Odumosu@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Applied Human Physiology
Virginia Ruiz Garate
Marcela Munera
Abstract
Individuals with tetraplegia rely on assistive devices to perform Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and enhance independence. This review evaluates their effectiveness and user acceptance for supporting independence. A systematic literature search was conducted across seven databases from September 2004-2024, (PROSPERO: CRD42022370351). Studies evaluating assistive devices in experimental or real-world settings with individuals with tetraplegia that reported performance (task achievement) and perception (user experience) outcomes were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the Downs and Black checklist modified for non-intervention studies. From 1,670 initial records, 34 articles met inclusion criteria, involving 366 participants. Robotic arms, wearable exoskeletons, computer interfaces, powered wheelchairs, and functional electrical stimulation systems demonstrated varying effectiveness. Performance outcomes were often task-specific, and perception depended on ease of use, comfort, and adaptability. Few studies measured impact on quality of life or long-term adoption. Invasive technologies showed promising results but faced adoption barriers related to complexity and aesthetics. Heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis. While some assistive technologies improve independence, better usability and customization are needed for wider adoption. Technologies must offer substantial improvements to justify adaptation efforts. Reporting should be clearer and more standardized to facilitate comparison. Demographic biases (over-representation of spinal cord injury, global north, and males) limited generalizability.
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 24, 2025 |
Deposit Date | Jul 29, 2025 |
Print ISSN | 1040-0435 |
Electronic ISSN | 1949-3614 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Keywords | Assistive Technology; quality of life; tetraplegia; daily living |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/14726129 |
You might also like
Open-source re-configurable interfacing of Tobii Pro Glasses 2 with ROS2
(2022)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Real-time feedback on older adults exercise: A socially assistive robot coaching system
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Embedding soft synergies into soft materials for intrinsic compliant robotic hand grasping
(2022)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search