Sonia Mariotti
Language testing in awake craniotomy for brain tumor resection: A survey of current perioperative practice in the United Kingdom
Mariotti, Sonia; Barua, Neil U.; Williamson, Tom; Mumtaz, Hajira; Kinsey, Kris; Piasecki, Anna E.
Authors
Neil U. Barua
Tom Williamson
Hajira Mumtaz
Kris Kinsey Kris.Kinsey@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Psychology
Anna Piasecki Anna.Piasecki@uwe.ac.uk
Director of Research and Enterprise
Abstract
Background: Language testing and mapping procedures are considered the gold standard for safe tumor resection and preservation of language and communication in patients with tumors located in an area eloquent for language, especially in the presence of low grade gliomas. However, the current status of language testing in awake craniotomy in the United Kingdom is unknown. The main aim of this study was to describe the language testing practices in awake brain surgery across the UK.
Methods: An online survey was addressed to medical practitioners working with brain tumor patients during the phases of language testing. Questions inquired about the tests and approaches for language testing before, during and after the surgery. The survey also explored the management of bilingual brain tumor patients and gathered personal perspectives from clinicians.
Results: Responses were obtained from 37 clinicians. Speech and language therapists and neuropsychologists administered language tests to patients, and those with sufficient language skills for completing intraoperative tests were eligible for awake mapping. A combination of standardized language batteries and home-made tasks were used for language testing, leading to variability in testing practices across institutions. For language mapping, the most popular tasks were picture naming, sentence completion and repetition. Object and action naming were used across both the monolingual and bilingual patient groups. The timing of postoperative assessments varied according to patient needs and clinician availability. Bilingual patients were evaluated with interpreters and limited materials, compared to monolinguals.
Conclusions: The provision of awake craniotomy language testing presents differences across UK-based institutions. Responders advocate for more comprehensive, updated and inclusive materials to facilitate language testing in modern patient cohorts spanning a wide range of linguistic skills and foreign languages.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 4, 2025 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 8, 2025 |
Deposit Date | Mar 5, 2025 |
Journal | Neuro-Oncology Practice |
Print ISSN | 2054-2577 |
Electronic ISSN | 2054-2585 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaf027 |
Keywords | Brain tumor, awake craniotomy, language testing, aphasia, bilingualism |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/13902788 |
You might also like
Predicting user confidence during visual decision making
(2018)
Journal Article
Comment on letter to the editor: Magnocellular reading and dyslexia
(2005)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search