Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

How do we get the public into public health research? Learnings and key recommendations from initiating a community involvement project scheme

McGrath, Carmel; Lasseter, Gemma; Hopewell‐ Kelly, Noreen; Anderson, Emma; Brooks‐Pollock, Ellen; Christensen, Hannah; Denford, Sarah; Essery, Rosie; Dawson, Shoba; Schiller, Evelyn; Silvonen, Taru; Stokes, Christina; Thomas, Amy; Thomas, Clare; Gibson, Andy

How do we get the public into public health research? Learnings and key recommendations from initiating a community involvement project scheme Thumbnail


Authors

Carmel McGrath

Gemma Lasseter

Emma Anderson

Ellen Brooks‐Pollock

Hannah Christensen

Sarah Denford

Rosie Essery

Shoba Dawson

Evelyn Schiller

Taru Silvonen

Christina Stokes

Amy Thomas

Clare Thomas

Andy Gibson Andy.Gibson@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Patient and Public Involve



Abstract

Introduction: There are many recognised benefits of public involvement, including more relevant research. The COVID‐19 pandemic highlighted the existing health inequalities and disparities in access to care and treatment for under‐served groups, necessitating meaningful and sustainable approaches to engaging them in health research. However, there is limited guidance to suggest what groundwork and processes are necessary for initiating such projects. This paper outlines the practical approaches taken to initiate a community involvement project scheme and offers key recommendations from this work. Methods: The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit established a community involvement scheme in 2021, funding four community involvement projects enabling researchers to engage with under‐served communities. Reflections were captured through regular quarterly meeting group discussions, meeting notes and email correspondence. Results: The paper presents the steps taken to initiate a scheme that provided funding for a diverse range of projects working with under‐served communities. The projects demonstrated the value of allocating time to build relationships and trust, maintaining flexibility, and providing short‐term benefits such as remuneration and training to the community. Discussion: This paper has highlighted the need for research organisations to allocate funding and resources within their infrastructures for building trusting relationships with community leaders and communities. Conclusion: This paper has outlined the steps undertaken to engage with under‐served communities to bridge the gap between public health research and those communities. We present key recommendations to guide future initiatives aspiring to engage under‐served communities in health research. Patient or Public Contribution: Public contributors have been involved in all of the four community involvement projects mentioned in this paper. Two public contributors are also co‐authors and have provided input to the writing and review of this manuscript.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 5, 2024
Online Publication Date Dec 8, 2024
Publication Date Dec 31, 2024
Deposit Date Jan 16, 2025
Publicly Available Date Jan 16, 2025
Journal Health Expectations
Print ISSN 1369-6513
Electronic ISSN 1369-7625
Publisher Wiley Open Access
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 27
Issue 6
Article Number e70114
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70114
Keywords public health research, learning, PPI, UK Standards for Public Involvement, community involvement, public involvement, reciprocity
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/13528407

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations