Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes in women offered oncoplastic breast conserving surgery as an alternative to mastectomy in the ANTHEM multicentre, prospective cohort study

Davies, Charlotte; Johnson, Leigh; Conefrey, Carmel; Mills, Nicola; Fairbrother, Patricia; Holcombe, Chris; Whisker, Lisa; Hollingworth, William; Skillman, Joanna; White, Paul; MacMillan, Douglas; Comins, Charles; Potter, Shelley

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes in women offered oncoplastic breast conserving surgery as an alternative to mastectomy in the ANTHEM multicentre, prospective cohort study Thumbnail


Authors

Charlotte Davies

Leigh Johnson

Carmel Conefrey

Nicola Mills

Patricia Fairbrother

Chris Holcombe

Lisa Whisker

William Hollingworth

Joanna Skillman

Paul White Paul.White@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Applied Statistics

Douglas MacMillan

Charles Comins

Shelley Potter



Abstract

ABSTRACT

Background: Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OPBCS) may be a better option than mastectomy, but high-quality comparative evidence is lacking. The ANTHEM study (ISRCTN18238549) aimed to explore clinical and patient-reported outcomes in a multicentre cohort of women offered OPBCS as an alternative to mastectomy +/- immediate breast reconstruction (IBR).

Methods: Women aged >18 with invasive breast cancer or DCIS who were offered OPBCS to avoid mastectomy were recruited prospectively. Demographic, operative, oncological and 3- and 12-month complication data were collected. The proportion of women choosing OPBCS and the proportion in whom breast conservation was successful were calculated.
Participants completed the validated BREAST-Q at baseline, 3- and 12-months post-operatively. Questionnaires were scored according to the developers’ instructions and scores compared across timepoints in each group.

Results: 362 women from 32 breast units participated of whom 294 (81.2%) chose OPBCS. Of the OPBCS patients in whom post-operative margin status was reported, 210/255 (82.4%) had clear margins at initial surgery and only 10 (3.9%) required completion mastectomy. Major complications were significantly more likely after IBR.
Women having a successful therapeutic mammaplasty reported significant improvements in ‘Satisfaction with Breasts’ and ‘Psychosocial Well-being’ scores from baseline to 3- and 12-but both OPBCS group reported significant decreases in baseline ‘Physical Well-being’ at 3 and 12-months.

Conclusions: OPBCS allowed over 95% of women to avoid mastectomy with lower complication rates than IBR and improved patient-reported outcomes, especially after therapeutic mammaplasty. OPBCS should be offered as an alternative to mastectomy in all women in whom it is technically feasible.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 26, 2024
Online Publication Date Dec 24, 2024
Publication Date Jan 31, 2025
Deposit Date Nov 27, 2024
Publicly Available Date Feb 6, 2025
Journal British Journal of Surgery
Print ISSN 0007-1323
Electronic ISSN 1365-2168
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 112
Issue 1
Article Number znae306
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/13468955

Files







You might also like



Downloadable Citations