Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Measurement and prediction of the residual stress field generated by side-punching

Mahmoudi, A. H.; Stefanescu, D.; Hossain, S.; Truman, C. E.; Smith, D. J.; Withers, P. J.

Authors

Amir Mahmoudi Amir.Mahmoudi@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Engineering Principles

D. Stefanescu

S. Hossain

C. E. Truman

D. J. Smith

P. J. Withers



Abstract

Side-punching is proposed as a method of introducing a well-defined residual stress field into a laboratory-sized test specimen. Such a specimen may subsequently be used to assess the influence of residual stresses on the fracture behavior of materials. Side-punching consists of simultaneously indenting opposite faces of a plate of material with rigid tools, using sufficient force to cause localized yielding over a finite-sized volume of material adjacent to the punching tools. This paper presents experimental measurements, obtained using three independent measurement techniques, of the residual stress field generated in an aluminium alloy plate after side-punching. Incremental center hole drilling is used to determine the near-surface residual stress field, while synchrotron x-ray diffraction and deep hole drilling are used to measure the through-thickness residual stress field along a path linking the two punch center points. Finite element (FE) predictions are also presented and compared to the measurements. There is very good agreement between all three sets of measurements and the FE results, which all show that the through-thickness residual stresses are compressive and attain a maximum value at the center of the plate. The results confirm the potential use of side-punching in residual stress-crack interaction studies.

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date Mar 20, 2006
Publication Date Jul 1, 2006
Deposit Date Sep 12, 2024
Journal Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
Print ISSN 0094-4289
Electronic ISSN 1528-8889
Publisher American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 128
Issue 3
Pages 451-459
DOI https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2203103
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/12884973