Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Test-retest reliability for multiple-target visual search: Eye-tracking and performance metrics

Birch-Hurst, Kayley; Cooper, Jamie; Foot, Isabella; Muckleston, Oli; Clark, Kait

Authors

Kayley Birch-Hurst

Jamie Cooper

Isabella Foot

Oli Muckleston

Profile image of Kait Clark

Dr Kait Clark Kait.Clark@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Psychology (Cognitive and Neuro)



Abstract

Visual search plays a critical role in life-saving careers such as radiology and airport security. There has been growing interest in exploring factors specific to individual observers (e.g., personality, strategy) that can affect search accuracy; however, paradigms and measures with low test-retest reliability are inappropriate for the exploration of individual differences. There is value in investigating individual differences in multiple-target search due to its relevance for professional searches, but the test-retest reliability of multiple-target search and its associated eye movements remains unknown. We tested a sample of undergraduate participants (n = 75) in two sessions (separated by 1-3 weeks) on a multiple-target search task (0, 1, or 2 target ‘T’ shapes, presented at high or low salience, amongst distractor ‘L’ shapes). We measured accuracy, response time, and eye movements and assessed performance across single-, dual-, and no-target trials. The results revealed a range of test-retest reliabilities: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for accuracy measures ranged from fair (.25 ≤ ICC < .4) to moderate (.4 ≤ ICC < .6), and more difficult-to-spot “low-salience” targets produced higher reliabilities than more easy-to-spot “high-salience” targets. Response time measures were overall more reliable than accuracy measures, ranging from moderate (.4 ≤ ICC < .6) to good (.6 ≤ ICC < .8). Eye-tracking measures (e.g., number of fixations, fixation duration, initiation time, saccade rate, saccade amplitude) had the best levels of reliability overall, ranging from good (.6 ≤ ICC < .8) to excellent (ICC ≥ .8), except for saccade duration which was moderate. These results indicate that only some multiple-target search metrics offer a strong basis for assessing individual differences and that future work should consider a multi-faceted approach to investigating visual search behaviour, integrating performance and eye-tracking measures.

Presentation Conference Type Poster
Conference Name European Conference for Visual Perception
Start Date Aug 24, 2024
End Date Aug 30, 2024
Acceptance Date May 31, 2024
Deposit Date Sep 10, 2024
Print ISSN 0301-0066
Electronic ISSN 1468-4233
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/12881012

This file is under embargo due to copyright reasons.

Contact Kait.Clark@uwe.ac.uk to request a copy for personal use.




You might also like



Downloadable Citations