Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Evaluation of the impacts of patient and public involvement on cancer nursing doctoral study exploring cancer survivors’ experiences of living with chronic post cancer treatment pain

Armoogum, Julie; Hepburn, Julie; Prior, Michael; McCabe, Candy; Harcourt, Diana; Llewellyn, Alison; Foster, Claire; Gibson, Andy

Evaluation of the impacts of patient and public involvement on cancer nursing doctoral study exploring cancer survivors’ experiences of living with chronic post cancer treatment pain Thumbnail


Authors

Julie Hepburn

Michael Prior

Candy McCabe Candy.Mccabe@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Clinical Research and Practice

Diana Harcourt Diana2.Harcourt@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Appearance Research

Profile image of Alison Llewellyn

Alison Llewellyn Alison.Llewellyn@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Clinical Research

Claire Foster

Andy Gibson Andy.Gibson@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Patient and Public Involve



Abstract

Background. Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) can help shape research. It is important to capture the impacts that PPI have on cancer nursing doctoral research.
Methods: Two Public Contributors, who were cancer survivors living with chronic post cancer treatment pain, were recruited to work alongside the doctoral researcher throughout a PhD. To evaluate PPI impact, a Public Involvement Impact Log was maintained and Gibson and colleagues ‘CUBE’ framework was used. The ‘CUBE’ framework uses different forms of knowledge (public, professional) within a ‘knowledge space’ and incorporates four dimensions (voices, involvement, concerns, change). Two Public Contributors, four PhD supervisors and the doctoral researcher ranked PPI on a continuum for each dimension. This was then discussed in a workshop facilitated by a ‘CUBE’ expert external to the PhD team.
Results: PPI had many impacts on the research including inclusion of GP letters, interview scheduling, wording of patient facing documentation and settling researcher apprehensions regarding term ‘cancer survivor’. The ‘CUBE’ evaluation demonstrated consensus among team regarding PPI impact within the dimensions:
- ‘One way to be involved or many ways to be involved’: Median = 79 (range 71-100) towards many
- ‘Weak voice or strong voice’: Median = 89 (range 84-100) towards strong
- ‘Organisation’s concerns or public concern’: Median 50 (41-88) towards public concern
- ‘Organisation changes or organisation resists change’: Median 90 (range 80-100) towards willing to change
Prior to the workshop, the Public Contributors had not realised the degree of impact they had had on the research and the value attributed to their impact by the researcher.
Conclusion: Public Involvement Impact Logs and the ‘CUBE’ framework can be effective methods to evaluate PPI impact within cancer nursing doctoral studies. The workshops offered opportunity to articulate impact and appreciation of PPI. PPI should be included, encouraged and evaluated to capture the multiple perspectives of cancer care.

Presentation Conference Type Poster
Conference Name UKONS
Start Date Nov 17, 2023
End Date Nov 18, 2023
Publication Date Nov 19, 2023
Deposit Date Nov 13, 2023
Publicly Available Date Dec 20, 2023
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/11444746

Files








You might also like



Downloadable Citations