Julie Armoogum Julie.Armoogum@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Adult Nursing
Evaluation of the impacts of patient and public involvement on cancer nursing doctoral study exploring cancer survivors’ experiences of living with chronic post cancer treatment pain
Armoogum, Julie; Hepburn, Julie; Prior, Michael; McCabe, Candy; Harcourt, Diana; Llewellyn, Alison; Foster, Claire; Gibson, Andy
Authors
Julie Hepburn
Michael Prior
Candy McCabe Candy.Mccabe@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Clinical Research and Practice
Diana Harcourt Diana2.Harcourt@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Appearance Research
Alison Llewellyn Alison.Llewellyn@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Clinical Research
Claire Foster
Andy Gibson Andy.Gibson@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Patient and Public Involve
Abstract
Background. Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) can help shape research. It is important to capture the impacts that PPI have on cancer nursing doctoral research.
Methods: Two Public Contributors, who were cancer survivors living with chronic post cancer treatment pain, were recruited to work alongside the doctoral researcher throughout a PhD. To evaluate PPI impact, a Public Involvement Impact Log was maintained and Gibson and colleagues ‘CUBE’ framework was used. The ‘CUBE’ framework uses different forms of knowledge (public, professional) within a ‘knowledge space’ and incorporates four dimensions (voices, involvement, concerns, change). Two Public Contributors, four PhD supervisors and the doctoral researcher ranked PPI on a continuum for each dimension. This was then discussed in a workshop facilitated by a ‘CUBE’ expert external to the PhD team.
Results: PPI had many impacts on the research including inclusion of GP letters, interview scheduling, wording of patient facing documentation and settling researcher apprehensions regarding term ‘cancer survivor’. The ‘CUBE’ evaluation demonstrated consensus among team regarding PPI impact within the dimensions:
- ‘One way to be involved or many ways to be involved’: Median = 79 (range 71-100) towards many
- ‘Weak voice or strong voice’: Median = 89 (range 84-100) towards strong
- ‘Organisation’s concerns or public concern’: Median 50 (41-88) towards public concern
- ‘Organisation changes or organisation resists change’: Median 90 (range 80-100) towards willing to change
Prior to the workshop, the Public Contributors had not realised the degree of impact they had had on the research and the value attributed to their impact by the researcher.
Conclusion: Public Involvement Impact Logs and the ‘CUBE’ framework can be effective methods to evaluate PPI impact within cancer nursing doctoral studies. The workshops offered opportunity to articulate impact and appreciation of PPI. PPI should be included, encouraged and evaluated to capture the multiple perspectives of cancer care.
Presentation Conference Type | Poster |
---|---|
Conference Name | UKONS |
Start Date | Nov 17, 2023 |
End Date | Nov 18, 2023 |
Publication Date | Nov 19, 2023 |
Deposit Date | Nov 13, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 20, 2023 |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/11444746 |
Files
Evaluation of the impacts of patient and public involvement on cancer nursing doctoral study exploring cancer survivors’ experiences of living with chronic post cancer treatment pain
(363 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
The development of clinical recommendations to improve experiences of chronic pain after cancer treatment for people living with and beyond cancer
(2023)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search